App seems horrible, raise size is what you add to your current bet not how much you want to bet? what's the deal with buying time banks? Are there settings hacks to make this more like normal online poker?

There is pokerminion but keep in mind that any assistance software at this point is a grey area and can potentially lead to issues down the road

What is the iphone emulator called so you can play pokerbros on your computer and not have to play it over a phone?

Don't know about iphone emulators but BlueStacks is an Android emulator that you can play PokerBros on.

Do I need an android or can I just download bluestacks and play on the computer?

Can an account join multiple clubs or will I need to create a separate account to join another club?

You don't need android. You do need a google account though (free). Bluestacks is quite a resource hog so you probably need a decent computer.

You don't need a separate account to join multiple clubs.

Most people use ldplayer. Alternatives are bluestacks, nox and memuplay

All emulators demand alot of ressources and you should have strong computer if you want more than 4 tables without issues/severe lags

best answer I could have hoped for, thanks!

Going full Negreanu here with the more rake is better argument here I see. What an absolute leech.

Agree ef the middle man

The real solution is everyone on this app should be demanding 40% rb.. especially if they play any significant volume. That still leaves room for the agents to make something.

Also ban players that win say 4-6 consecutive months (they most likely wouldn’t be human so that could clean games up)

Also when you ban accounts they should be looking for new sign ups that are winning players. A new sign up wins 2-3 months in a row banished.

Basically it’s on the player to stand up for themselves and get the best deal and that will make poker great again.

So you want to ban good players and players that run good over a 4 to 6 month period?

So I think the rake is Glitched when you run it multiple times.

At the start of the hand - you can see Bradley Beal called $26 because I made it $26 pre flop - but Fu#ksite39 only had $13.59. There was a side pot which I won all of that or net profit of $12.41 because $26 - $13.59 = $12.41. The site only credited me $8.31 as you can see in these pictures. Basically I just jammed the flop and Bradley beal folded.


Here you can see it took a penny from my 2nd site pot and only credited me $8.31 when I should of had a profit of $12.41




Here you can see I made it $26 pre flop and the winner of the main pot only had $13~ so there should of been $26 side pot to fight for so I should of won a bigger side pot.



Here it shows how much the winner of the main pot got - which looks correct.





Am I missing something or is the site screwed up?

Not so much the small time winners under 2k/mo but the actual crushers... it’s pretty standard to exclude crushers from games whether they’re using assistance or not.

It wiping also increase volume when the average joe stands a chance and doesn’t take a blood bath.

Crushers are part of the game, as are average Joe's, as are people who don't know when to stop. Maybe less worrying about how much somebody else makes or loses, it's basically not anybody's business; let ecosystem play it out itself. Focus should be running fair games and being trustworthy with peoples funds (these do not belong to clubs or agents, they are just holding on to it while players fight it out). No need to go full-Amaya or like that tanned nit TimStone and start leaning hard on winners or grinders who are giving their best 24/7 - doing that will give everyone wrong message in the end.

Huge part of the playerpool is simple fish that secretly aspires to be pro one day. You want to run 'SUCKERS ONLY/NEVER WITHDRAW' club that tells its players you will boot them when they reach that goal? You kill the dream, you kill the game.

More targeted toward cheaters... most winners wouldn’t be affected.

lol so stupid.

I haven't had a losing month in like 3 years, so what is your solution for players like me? lifetime ban?

Why these people who are always talking about Fixing the games, ecosystem, banning players always so silent towards the biggest crusher of them all - the pokersite/rake?

What do you think would happen to NLHE games on Diamond union if you lowered the avg bb/100 in rake from what is now which is about 10bb/100 to 3bb/100 for each player?

I mentioned rake back... just Bc we do one thing doesn’t mean we can’t do many.. again.. Did u win 30k over 3 mos 10k each mo?

Have you had any losing months?

If you have had a losing month you most likely wouldn’t get banned but I think 6mos w no losses should be bannable

Something needs to be done.. it’s the Wild West. People playing team poker in tournaments timing down. Colluding is a thing. Etc.

Another alternative for agents or club owners to save on costs could be to start clubs where the high stakes games have a multiple for value... so 100 is really 1,000 or 10,000. To save on chips. I know for high stakes it must cost a ton for diamonds.

Poker bros hasn’t even been out for 3 years... but ya you’re banned. Also what variant do you play to never have a losing month hilo?

if you really wanted a fair system on the poker bros rake model it would be like 70% Rakeback for all w no middle man, but this is unpractical and pointless to talk about because there will always be a middle man in online poker.

Yea I have done this before many times. So what? How much money is Diamond union raking off the tables everymonth?


yea maybe like 5 years ago.

lol. yea people are cheating so ban anyone that wins. unreal.

I played online since like 2005. Playing NLHE and PLO.

All your suggestions are stupid, you are targetting like 3% of the player pool and ignoring overpriced rake, predator app devs and agents.

Not sure either why you think something desperately needs to be done...biggest bros union hitting like 500 tables running almost everyday. Pokerstars.eu getting over 100k ppl logged in. Poker is far from dead and people are always going to play it.

Poker isn’t dead.. but cleaning up games should always be a priority. Stars just had the collusion at final table.. cheating and attempted cheating is ongoing. I guess you think you’re such a crusher that’s you don’t worry that your profits might have been lower than they could be.

I’m all for lowering rake ...

70% rb isn’t a thing though Bc agents make 50% so at 70% agents would be losing money.

There’s actually no middle man on acr betonline and iignition ps and pp...the agent system is middle man Bc you have both sites and agents making rake off you. Sites make rake off you in the form of diamonds etc.

I don’t think you know what middle man means; I think you mean operator

so we need to clean up the games by banning all crushers. cool suggestion bro.

middle man = agent. When I say middle man in all my other posts i mean agent or rakeback agencies.

not sure why you saying 70% rb isn't a thing, because in some clubs/sites it is. Also I said 70% w no agent...but then you want to talk about agents losing money? wat?

also there are still agents promoting clubs and offering deals for those sites you said.

Do you even win at poker?