Quote:
Originally Posted by Andyfothershops
Vas, when you look at the stats do you distinguish between full ring and 6 max? The 100nl full ring level has been pretty much destroyed by ccg tables. There are only ever one or two running so there has to be an overall decline in table and player numbers at this level. Is there a possibility that CCG tables have been a failure at full ring contributing to a faster decline in an already dying format? If this proves to be the case will you consider removing CCG tables from full ring format?
http://gyazo.com/f12785b16f1033f1b8d9391d1266c129
Vas, This is the state of 100nl full ring on a Saturday night at around 7:30 GMT+1. Two tables, both rec tables. Look at the stats from before rec tables were introduced. Party was one of only two sites you could still multi-table small stakes full ring. (maybe 3 if you count 888, I'm not 100% sure of the current state of their ssfr action)
The drop in traffic could be partly blamed on the decline of on line full ring poker, but not a drop that is both this chronic and this severe.
I don't need to tell you who the other site is. When I was younger and in my first sales manager roll, I was told, that one of the secrets to success, was to be around and to emulate successful people. It was good advice. Take a look at what the other site do once in a while, you might learn something.
Please drop these tables at full ring. you still get 7 or 8 sharks preying on 1 or 2 recs, but these are the great whites from other sites, one tabling at party, busting the recs as quickly if not more quickly than before.
If you don't do something quickly, these games will die on your site. I lost palladium this quarter for the first time in over a year. I wonder how many more of us did ?