Quote:
Originally Posted by IHasTehNutz
^^I don't think Merge woke up one day and said "how can we make it harder for winning players to cash out". And I don't think their intention is to try to take Bovada's spot among US-facing rooms. Can they improve in areas? Goes without question. Are they moving the model towards casual players? Most likely, if not obviously. But for really high volume players making multiple payout requests per week/month, of whom are a sliver of the overall player pool (not arguing importance to ecology here - different topic altogether), maybe processing them in such an amount wasn't worth the cost. Who really knows?
They are charging us to withdrawal, we're paying the cost. Considering basically every change since the new management took over has been anti reg I'd say yes, they wake up on a daily bases trying to figure out ways to make it harder to make money here. This isn't a casual player model, it's a "keep players from withdrawing large amounts all at once" model.
-Highest rake among US sites
-Non existent VIP program (even worse than Bovada's which is tough)
^Also, now won't let certain players get bonuses^
-Bans cash game players who win too much
-Restricts winning MTT players to as little as 1 table
-Charges for every withdrawal (minus 1 freebie a year!!!!)
-Picks and chooses who gets certain withdrawal methods(even though we pay the fees)
-Limits the majority of players to 1 $2,500 check a month (occasionally 2 if you're on a life heater)
I could go on, but you already know all of this. What do you call this model besides making it as hard as possible to get the money you earn off the site? Bovada is a recreational model yet they still pay us within days and don't ban us... It has nothing to do with Merge not wanting to be #1, it's about them wanting to make things as hard as possible so you'll punt in the casino/book so they don't have to pay you.