Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread [Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread

06-07-2019 , 03:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AwwitsBae
Just take it from PT4 or HM2(assuming you use them if you have ICMIZER)


I don’t atm. I was trying out DriveHUD, to avoid the use of card catcher. However, I’m not sure if it’s the DriveHUD or what, specifically, that is giving me issues trying to utilize ICMIZER so I just downloaded the catcher and I’m trying to get my current db switched over into the card catcher file to see if hem solves the issue.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-07-2019 , 03:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Priccc
Noted and no, I'm not using the pro version of CB. And why does CB close accounts for withdrawing from a gambling site? Are they against it? Also what wallet would you suggest instead? Or any other type of transfer maybe?
this is how my withdrawal process usually works

request withdrawal via BTC to Blockchain wallet

find best price using Blockchain's Swap feature or using shapeshift.io to convert BTC to another crypto you can Xfer to CBP (I do this bc CBP can search last 5 transactions on the blockchain and see where your BTC on Blockchain wallet came from i.e. poker site).

Xfer different crypto to CBP, and sell on their market for $.

Send $ from CBP to CB wallet and withdraw via Paypal.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-08-2019 , 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Ivan
I don’t atm. I was trying out DriveHUD, to avoid the use of card catcher. However, I’m not sure if it’s the DriveHUD or what, specifically, that is giving me issues trying to utilize ICMIZER so I just downloaded the catcher and I’m trying to get my current db switched over into the card catcher file to see if hem solves the issue.
Send me the file you're trying to import, and I'll contact Icmizer and see what's going on. I believe you said it's the full tournament that is causing an issue, not individual hands correct?
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-08-2019 , 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreakDaddy
Send me the file you're trying to import, and I'll contact Icmizer and see what's going on. I believe you said it's the full tournament that is causing an issue, not individual hands correct?


Correct. Individual hands appear properly, (right-click, export ICMIZER,) and no issues. But exporting the full tournament, I seem to encounter an error, or not all hands - obvious push/fold hands that should be showing, will display in the software.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-08-2019 , 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCAChiTown




Like what?



That's an understatement.



There already is a cap of 8. What would you prefer it be?



You're dead to me.



100% agree with all of that.
Completely missed this. 8 Just seems high for what is now a pretty small site. I rarely see any stake with more than 8 tables going. If you can play every game at your main stake, and a few at a stake below, having a cap is pretty pointless IMO.

I wonder if they are ever going to go live with the sub-forum.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-08-2019 , 03:09 PM
I was usuing Holdem Resources Calculator today to study spots from previous tourneys I've played. I have been doing this all week. I play mainly on BetOnline. Today...midstudy session...all of a sudden I could not copy and paste hands from BetOnline into the HRC anymore. Other sites work...but not BetOnline. It seems as tho BetOnline told HRC they cant use their HHs anymore?? Why would this be the case. I already emailed HRC support to inquire more. If anyone has any info please let me know. Bunch of new nicks on BetOnline last 3 or 4 weeks...a lot of them good players....and u can't SharkScope them for some reason. Now I can't review tourneys from that site either? Is the fix in or what? Who is in charge here?
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-08-2019 , 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdroz247
Completely missed this. 8 Just seems high for what is now a pretty small site. I rarely see any stake with more than 8 tables going. If you can play every game at your main stake, and a few at a stake below, having a cap is pretty pointless IMO.

I wonder if they are ever going to go live with the sub-forum.
I think 8 is normally fine for most stakes. The summer months tend to be a down period for traffic at most online poker sites. The only stake where I think you can consistently hit the table cap by only playing that stake is 100NL right now. In the fall and winter months you can usually hit the 8 table cap at most stakes for much of the day, especially if you're willing to play both 6max and 9max tables.

In the past I've advocated for a 6 table cap at 6max and 9 table cap at 9max with a max of 9 tables if you mix. I think 8 total is a good compromise, but I wouldn't be too upset if it was 6 total. Caps rarely affect me as I prefer to 4 table most of the time anyway, and more often I'll play less than that rather than more, but there are occasions where I'm in the mood to play more.

Not that I have much reason to care about the profits the network makes from rake, but I wouldn't be surprised if they noticed the drastic reduction when they did implement a 4 table cap for the short time period that they did not too long ago. I just don't think it makes sense to reduce the amount they can potentially make by limiting their limited traffic to pay rake at only half the tables they could be raking at.

If it was 15, 20 or even an unlimited cap then I'd probably agree that a reduction would improve the games, but currently I don't feel like limiting it even further from 8 would drastically improve the games.

What would improve the games is getting rid of the bots, improving security and increasing advertising at social media sites and forums to attract new potential customers in the countries with high disposable incomes.

Last edited by MCAChiTown; 06-08-2019 at 04:10 PM.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-08-2019 , 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCAChiTown

What would improve the games is getting rid of the bots, improving security and increasing advertising at social media sites and forums to attract new potential customers in the countries with high disposable incomes.
Spot on. Chico Network. Hire this man ASAP!
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-08-2019 , 09:50 PM
There is no traffic in cash games right now, is this normal?
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-09-2019 , 12:08 AM
You could hit the table cap of 8 full tables at 100NL or 200NL right this moment if you had been sitting at those tables since you posted, and that's without needing to play a mix of both stakes. Like I mentioned earlier, traffic is less consistent in the summer months.

Last edited by MCAChiTown; 06-09-2019 at 12:15 AM.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-09-2019 , 12:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Beal
find best price using Blockchain's Swap feature or using shapeshift.io to convert BTC to another crypto you can Xfer to CBP (I do this bc CBP can search last 5 transactions on the blockchain and see where your BTC on Blockchain wallet came from i.e. poker site).
WHOAH. I have never heard anyone talk about this. Is this true and if so does this matter?

If I consistently get payouts from BOL > Blockchain > Coinbase, am I going to get my account closed??
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-09-2019 , 12:57 AM
Unlikely, but certainly still possible if they want to go out of their way to track the history of your transaction. Most accounts that got closed sent directly from a gambling site to CB. It's always better to take more precaution than less.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-09-2019 , 02:12 AM
What's the deal with this network? Reliable on cashouts? Fair with players?

How is the mid stakes PLO traffic? Do they have rakeback/rake races?

Thanks for the help.

Also, what's the best US facing skin?

Last edited by jonnyman34; 06-09-2019 at 02:22 AM.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-09-2019 , 10:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dead Cities
Just made my first deposit request today at 10:40 am (central) for $620. Losing value on the monthly fee waiver but I wanted to experience the process first hand so I feel comfortable with it. Will post when received.

Upon updating my trezor I noticed that trezor now has a crypto exchange. Not sure what utility this has if I can't transfer cash.
Updating this exchange. Noting that original request was at 10:40 am central time on Friday June 7th.

Went to bed Sunday June 9th ~12:30 am. Did not receive notice of processed deposit within 24 hours per claim of customer service email.

Woke up around 7 am Sunday June 9th and have a message in my BOL account saying that order has been processed. Log in to Trezor and funds are already there.

Go to immediately move funds to Coinbase. Coinbase asking for my verification (again). Note:If using Coinbase, make sure its ready to roll before initiating this process. Hook up the scanner, get my DL photoed and uploaded and verified instantly. Now just waiting on the funds to hit Coinbase.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-09-2019 , 11:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCAChiTown
Unlikely, but certainly still possible if they want to go out of their way to track the history of your transaction. Most accounts that got closed sent directly from a gambling site to CB. It's always better to take more precaution than less.
This is a true statement but I never understood it. How do they know??
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-09-2019 , 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dead Cities
Updating this exchange. Noting that original request was at 10:40 am central time on Friday June 7th.

Went to bed Sunday June 9th ~12:30 am. Did not receive notice of processed deposit within 24 hours per claim of customer service email.

Woke up around 7 am Sunday June 9th and have a message in my BOL account saying that order has been processed. Log in to Trezor and funds are already there.

Go to immediately move funds to Coinbase. Coinbase asking for my verification (again). Note:If using Coinbase, make sure its ready to roll before initiating this process. Hook up the scanner, get my DL photoed and uploaded and verified instantly. Now just waiting on the funds to hit Coinbase.
Bitcoin hit Coinbase ~ 10:30 am Sunday June 9th. Coinbase only giving me the option of instant sell for $9. Not crazy about that fee, def gonna look into another exchange.

Went ahead and linked my paypal account. CB to Bank is ~ 4 day wait, CB to PP to bank is ~ 2days.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-09-2019 , 01:06 PM
Hi all,

I'm not sure if this should be posted here or moved to a software forum, so my apologies if it's in the wrong place.

I just started playing poker on Chico Network, but not sure what the best option is. I've played from the browser, PC - Windows 10, and Mac - Mojave. I'd like to start using a HUD since I hear a lot of people talking about it. What's the best Chico Network poker option for this (browser, win10, or mac)? From what I understand, if using a HUD, Windows is the best choice. However, the poker software is a resource hog, and will lag + time out everywhere if I have 4 tables up.


https://imgur.com/Z0gtIfV

This is after a reboot and only opening the poker client with 0 tables up.

Any and all suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks

Last edited by Morgon; 06-09-2019 at 01:10 PM. Reason: Image showed 404, added imgur link.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-09-2019 , 03:53 PM
Well, you should definitely be checking out the Software forums, where there are threads for most HUDs.

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/1...cial-software/
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-09-2019 , 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Well, you should definitely be checking out the Software forums, where there are threads for most HUDs.

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/1...cial-software/
Yes, but I'm also trying to figure out what's the best ui implementation that a HUD is compatible with.

If that answer can't be answered here, then what are you guys using with your HUDs?(PC, Mac, web browser, etc.)

Is Windows 10 usable for others? I'd assume so, but for some reason the poker software I'm using for Windows is a resource hog like no other. For example, if I can't play more than 2 table w/o lag+timing out, then playing on Windows 10 is pointless. I know not all HUDs work on Mac, and I'm not sure if HUDs retrieve hh's from web browser play.

If these general noob questions about Chico Network poker aren't supposed to be here, then my apologies and please move if possible.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-10-2019 , 08:08 AM
So I have been playing on here for a little under a month and requested my first cah out a few days ago. There has been a delay and after reaching out I recieved a response today that says it was notied that my account and another account share an IP against who there was na adverse action.

The account against was Luisimi_Fan however I have no clue who or why this account has the same IP adress as me. Any clue as to what is going on and how I ahould approach this? I assume this account was somehow spoofing my IP but I dont know how. Any suggestions on how to appoach this?
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-10-2019 , 08:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCAChiTown
Unlikely, but certainly still possible if they want to go out of their way to track the history of your transaction. Most accounts that got closed sent directly from a gambling site to CB. It's always better to take more precaution than less.
Is there a better option to Coin Base? That’s where I have my BC, but if they’re anti gambling I’d prefer not to do business with them.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-10-2019 , 08:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCAChiTown
What withdrawal method did you choose?
I requested bitcoin.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-10-2019 , 11:39 AM
Gemini is better than coinbase.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-10-2019 , 01:33 PM
Did a small withdrawal from here a couple of weeks ago and it was in the coinbase account and then my bank within 36 hours. This is the fastest payout for us players right now.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-10-2019 , 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prince_of_Whales
So I have been playing on here for a little under a month and requested my first cah out a few days ago. There has been a delay and after reaching out I recieved a response today that says it was notied that my account and another account share an IP against who there was na adverse action.

The account against was Luisimi_Fan however I have no clue who or why this account has the same IP adress as me. Any clue as to what is going on and how I ahould approach this? I assume this account was somehow spoofing my IP but I dont know how. Any suggestions on how to appoach this?
I have gotten this randomly in the past. I don't know why or how this happens. I just told them the truth that I don't know anything about why the IP would match and that I didnt know anything about the player.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote

      
m