Still haven't made up my mind. I swear if this goes on much longer, I'll switch my handle here to ThinkingItThrough.
I've been reading up on this thread and have seen that you always give ppl honest advice, even if that means recommending them not to take one of your courses. So I'm hoping you can give me the final nudge.
Right now I'm leaning towards getting the Bootcamp. I think all this hemming and hawing means I'm not quite ready to commit to CFP. My plan is to rebuild my game from the ground up. I'm mid-40 and just not sure if I'm willing to put in the effort to try to move up to $100 or whatnot. If the Bootcamp -and maybe a sub- can help me to comfortably make 4-5bb/100 at NL10 Zoom, then I'll be a happy (boot)camper.
So what's keeping me back? Well, there is a chance (though I think it's small) that I actually already know most if not all of this stuff. I actually used to make a killing 24-tabling NL100 FR back in 2006-2009. I've already had $10K months. But back then, all you really needed were some preflop hand charts and postflop discipline. Just make a set+, bet big and collect stacks.
After a break to raise my son, I'm now finding things are VERY different. 6Max NL10 Zoom in 2016 is MUCH harder than NL100 was back in the day. The rake has increased. Rakeback is lower. $100/hour has become $1/hour.
I've tried other stuff. Snowie. The Grinder's Manual (which I like a lot btw). PIOsolver. Some of Mike Gano's stuff. They all have their merits, but they feel like pieces of the puzzle. And I feel like I have lost the cover of my puzzle box, so I have no idea what the final shape should look like.
Given all of this, do you think the BC + sub will help me beat NL10 Zoom at a good clip? I realize it is a 100-piece puzzle and CFP Crusher is the 1000 piece version - but I actually like to start from the beginning. It also helps that I'm in no financial rush whatsoever. And I can always go for the advanced stuff later.
Last edited by Softspot; 10-28-2016 at 10:15 AM.