Quote:
Originally Posted by thatsnotplusev
Horrible critique..
I'm not trying to be a dick and I don't think you were either, but why not give your own thoughts on the hand and explain why his might be flawed, instead of just telling him how horrible you think his analysis is??
Because his analysis is so horrible that it doesn't deserve any further reply, but I'll humour you...
In his post he says
a) that he "didnt like" a check-raise with the second nuts in an aggressive HU match
b) "It's like he knew Sauce had a straight and wanted to stack it off anyway" (wtf? seriously... WTF?) and
c) that coinflipping in Omaha is some unique thing that only Ziig is doing
enough said