Quote:
Originally Posted by mistergrinch
Why would Ivey, one of the world's best and most successful high stakes players, have a similar effect if he won as Moneymaker, the average joe accountant who qualified from a $40 on-line satellite? It seems to me that someone like Ivey winning would have just the opposite effect on the poker masses, and could actually be bad for the game. I'm thinking we need a Chinese Moneymaker, but I doubt there's anyone left in the field who fits that description.
Everybody thinks they're really good at poker, even people who've only played a handful of times. Emphasizing that poker is a game of skill will draw more fish, not scare them away. Unlike chess or billiards, it is difficult for most people to evaluate who is outplaying who in a poker game, and even after being crushed and losing all their money fish still come away thinking they were the better player.
In addition to that, Ivey taking it down would be another chink in the armor of the UIGEA, and we all know that the best thing for the games is for people to be able to impulse-deposit with their credit card after seeing a Full Tilt commercial during half-time.