Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilbury Twist
All in all, I still really like Cada's chances. The two biggest stacks mostly got there by either turning into a card rack, or winning an unbelievable cooler. But Cada has chipped up by earning pots. That was one helluva display all evening.
By the way, I see quite a few comments that he has improved quite a bit since 2009. And while that's almost certainly true, is it possible that the plays he made tonight (esp. the shove with 55) were not really all that different from the small-pair shoves he made at the 2009 N9? He just happened to run into bigger hands against Shulman or whoever it was (EDIT: it was Saout).
i.e. he did tonight what he did nine years ago, but because of the cards his opponents happened to have, he looks like a genius tonight while looking like a lucksack donk then. To me, he's taking the classic "go big or go home" strategy, which probably explains the tourney success he has had -- both then and now.
Disagree. He played
extremely tight for most of the past two days and took the conservative route more often than not. I would say it was the opposite of "go big or go home." More like, "avoid variance at all costs."
He shove A6s when very short and got lucky to double. He 4 bet shoved 55 in a blind vs. blind type of situation. He ran the huge bluff with ace high against Lynskey. By and large though, he played ultra tight and took no chances. That's probably part of why the A-high bluff went through. His table image was perfect at the time.
I think he played amazingly well overall. He made a questionable fold with JJ last night in a tricky spot. In general, he hasn't been catching elite hands (can't remember him holding QQ-AA more than maybe once in the past day or two) and yet he's still here. Testament to him. Great display.