Quote:
Originally Posted by shaniac
I guess so...from the Klout site: "Your True Reach is the number of people you influence. We filter out spam and bots and focus on the people who are acting on your content. When you post a message, these people tend to respond or share it."
So, yeah, 530 people, out of a million, when most people seem to have a true reach that corresponds roughly with their follower count.
If his 1M follower count was really the basis for hiring him (and I guess it is deceptively alluring), then someone got duped.
I don't think it matters too much whether it was his twitter following that got him hired or not (I would guess it's more likely because he's buddies with someone at the WPT, but that's nothing more than a guess).
What concerns me more is that people with some influence in the poker world (in this instance, the decision makers at the WPT) would make a decision which was clearly going to bring more negativity to the poker community (this thread for example). And if the WPT didn't realise it would bring a negative response then they didn't do their due diligence (which is also pretty bad for other obvious reasons).
The decision to hire someone with so much baggage is at the very least naive and shows that the WPT's decision makers are incompetent, or worse, they knew it would bring some ill-feeling and did it anyway (effectively giving the poker community the finger).