Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to?

04-10-2018 , 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Checkmaker
Health/dental/vision? Insurance, all bad bets. Betting that your health, dental, and vision will fail you. That's not a gift, it's a curse.
Wait until you're 40.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitemares
Wait until you're 40.
That is exactly what I'm not going to do. Wait. I'm going to be active. Health care isn't white magic. A regimen of pills to treat symptoms is an inferior solution to treating the cause of the problems. Stopping problems before I even have them.

Quote:
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Checkmaker
That is exactly what I'm not going to do. Wait. I'm going to be active. Health care isn't white magic. A regimen of pills to treat symptoms is an inferior solution to treating the cause of the problems. Stopping problems before I even have them.
I'd still recommend some health insurance just in case. Your total bankroll for bodies is 1, and it is a significant asset. Probably makes sense to insure it, even if you have to take the slight negative side. And you can get some smaller benefits from the insurance even in the absence of a near total loss, probably including some benefits aimed toward prevention.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 07:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego05
I'd still recommend some health insurance just in case. Your total bankroll for bodies is 1, and it is a significant asset. Probably makes sense to insure it, even if you have to take the slight negative side. And you can get some smaller benefits from the insurance even in the absence of a near total loss, probably including some benefits aimed toward prevention.
Good advice, thank you. I'm totally going to ignore it though because I'm arrogant.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 07:58 PM
Rich those benefits go way up in value once you have a family. Without it you're paying a ton out of pocket, then there's the retirement angle as well.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 08:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpinMeRightRound
10-14 years ago, we had guys like Dwan, Galfond, Haxton, nanonoko, isildur, jungleman etc. depositing $50-$100, starting at the micros, rising all the way up to mid-high stakes. These guys were naturally talented, intelligent, gifted, with a strong work ethic and got to the top of their field through a mixture of all these things.

This just doesn't seem to happen anymore. Yes, we have regulation which has affected a lot of countries. But most of Europe, Canada, Asia and South America are still part of the global player pool - that's a lot of countries, and just by the law of probabilities, you'd expect there to be at least some gifted young people who pick up poker and rise up the stakes quickly.

Besides, countries like USA, Italy, Spain, France can still play poker. So there's nothing stopping an intelligent person depositing and grinding up the stakes.

Yes, poker is a lot tougher now. But so is every competitive field, yet new talent rises to the top every year in sport, music etc. to replace the old talent. Not true for poker. The players at high stakes are the same faces who climbed up the stakes years ago. There are no young prodigies who have recently risen to the top - this is rather worrying.

Yes, poker does not get the mainstream media attention it once did. But many competitive fields don't. This shouldn't stop a young, intelligent, motivated person discovering poker and grinding up the stakes.


Why don't we see this happening anymore?
Youngsters have other intesrests. Like Twitch, professional gaming etc. Much more attractive than playing poker for living, which will be solved in few years.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 08:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil S
Because the fad is over.

I think this is real concern. People don't see poker as way to get rich anymore. It was like that 10 years ago, but not anymore. Now poker is something you do just when you're very bored and got nothing else to do.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 08:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ishipkq
lack of money in poker, game not being fun anymore
This. I have played professionally for 7 years now and I have to admit it's getting to point where the game just gets boring. We need an upgrade to make it more interesting. It just gets boring.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 08:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by madlex
Depends on where you live. In a third world country, that’s a lot of money.

If you take a closer look at where $30/hours leaves you for example in a country in Western/Northern Europe, you end up slightly above minimum wage after accounting for health care/retirement match, 20-28 days paid vacation time, 40+ sick days and other benefits.

Average monthly wage in a Denmark is ~$6k (before taxes) for example. I highly doubt only doctors and lawyers make $30 hour there..
The US. It's over 3x mininum wage fwiw. I don't expect any benefits from any jobs in this day and age. I'm talking about normal jobs someone can expect to get without college degrees or specialized training.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 08:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9tablingnit
I think this is real concern. People don't see poker as way to get rich anymore. It was like that 10 years ago, but not anymore. Now poker is something you do just when you're very bored and got nothing else to do.
No, it's more complete than that. Poker just isn't something people want to do at ALL anymore. People aren't interested any more. It was neat for a while but it's boring now.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 09:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil S
No, it's more complete than that. Poker just isn't something people want to do at ALL anymore. People aren't interested any more. It was neat for a while but it's boring now.
Most people just think it's illegal. I live in a state with casinos and regulated online poker. Plenty of people go and gamble at the casinos and it seems like no one even knows there is online gaming in my state. The small casinos have poker tourneys and cash games all the time but no one knows about any online poker. It doesn't help that there is absolutely no advertising meanwhile right over the state line NJ has endless ads in my state.


Hell I was deep into online poker until 2011 and I didn't realize we could still play until like 2 years ago, I didn't play for 4 years cuz of that. Most people don't see it as an option cuz they just don't know any better.


I didn't even know any better and I've been on 2+2 pretty hardcore since '05, lost my main account in the 2+2 hacking. To expect any recreational/non 2+2ers to know about it is asking a lot these days.

Last edited by Sir Huntington; 04-10-2018 at 09:34 PM.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 09:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsMattPerry
Most literate people would read it as "Russia". I mean if you're going to type like a teenage girl from the early 2000s you could at least say "R U" to make your keyboard-mashing buffoonery somewhat comprehensible.
Except everyone who read it understood it probably instantly. I basically never abbreviate like that, really no clue why I did in that post, too much wine.

Last edited by whosnext; 04-10-2018 at 11:08 PM. Reason: removed personal insult
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 09:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil S
No, it's more complete than that. Poker just isn't something people want to do at ALL anymore. People aren't interested any more. It was neat for a while but it's boring now.
Poker isn't boring. NLHE is. There are still lots of rich guys wanting to **** around playing cards. You just won't find them at a NLHE table. They've all moved on to PLO, BigO, mixed games, and other poker variants.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Checkmaker
Good advice, thank you. I'm totally going to ignore it though because I'm arrogant.
Rich if you actually believe half the **** you say... I feel bad for you man.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WorldzMine
The US. It's over 3x mininum wage fwiw. I don't expect any benefits from any jobs in this day and age. I'm talking about normal jobs someone can expect to get without college degrees or specialized training.
You need a college degree and or specialized training in order to make a decent living in the USA. This isn't the 1950s anymore when education and training didn't mean ****.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 10:11 PM
Another problem is the fact that all the big cash game action moved to Asia off the grid to the rest of the world.

Having high stakes action televised brought a lot of attention and appeal to the game in the early days. In those days you got to see all the top level pros going at it. Now, you just hear about massive action in distant countries.

Imagine if you were only able to hear about the top the players going at it in any other sport. That will kill any sport and take much attention away from the game. The coverage of the top echelons of the game has devolved into tidbits of information here and there about high stakes action in Asian casinos and private games.

You hear Hellmuth talk about how Dwan was throwing around $1-5 million like it was water over in Asia. If those $10 million pots were on television poker would be popular again.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 10:38 PM
You make a good point. It would be like if porn had a govt crackdown and only had a few tiny operators that no one knew about and all the big sites like pornhub were blocked from major markets. You'd have dudes going back to the XXX stores jacking it while watching some back room sex show like it was the 70s again.



Sticky floors anyone?
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 10:42 PM
i won $250 on slots last night
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 10:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spirit123
Just going to throw my 2 cents out, which is all common sense:

-On average, people play better. There are numerous training sites and 2+2 and free youtube videos. Anybody, even a beginning recreational gambler, can access these and immediately become tougher to beat. You can go from absolute beginner to intermediate within a month of intense study now. The path has been laid out and people are playing more optimally more of the time.

-Gamblers lose money faster than ten years ago. You'll be lucky to have one person giving away money at a 3/5 table, whereas 10 years ago, you might have 2-4 guys spewing like crazy at the table.

-In general, tables are much more serious. People are realizing they can lose lots of money quickly if they don't improve and/or tighten up and/or stop being overly aggressive. So they stop doing dumb things. They learn from their mistakes much faster, in general, or they realize they are never going to get good and/or they will lose money too fast and they stop playing.

-only a small percentage of players win, and even a smaller percentage win big. Grinders really have to grind now. The house always wins.
I like your two cents.

These points contribute to my point above that the top players from the online heydays are more likely to remain at the top. Even if you didn't have the various barriers to entry, it would still be tougher for a young upstart to ascend past all of the 25-year-old geezers to the poker throne.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 10:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Huntington
You make a good point. It would be like if porn had a govt crackdown and only had a few tiny operators that no one knew about and all the big sites like pornhub were blocked from major markets. You'd have dudes going back to the XXX stores jacking it while watching some back room sex show like it was the 70s again.
Now THERE'S a field where there is no shortage of new 18-21-year-old stars coming up every month, let alone every year.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 11:43 PM
its just not true what OP said, plenty of youngsters are rising up, can close thread now
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-10-2018 , 11:48 PM
Not everybody wants to be a full time poker player even if they could. Not sure why it’s so hard to accept. You have to be a bit crazy to want to play this game for a living long term.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-11-2018 , 12:09 AM
AmayaStars took away all rakeback. When you use to get 30% rakeback and then get ZERO, the cost to play has gone up 42%. Plus, they raised the rake, so it's 50% more to play on piece of **** PokerStars. No supernova program, you will never get anywhere playing low stakes on stars.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-11-2018 , 01:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Checkmaker
That is exactly what I'm not going to do. Wait. I'm going to be active. Health care isn't white magic. A regimen of pills to treat symptoms is an inferior solution to treating the cause of the problems. Stopping problems before I even have them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego05
I'd still recommend some health insurance just in case. Your total bankroll for bodies is 1, and it is a significant asset. Probably makes sense to insure it, even if you have to take the slight negative side. And you can get some smaller benefits from the insurance even in the absence of a near total loss, probably including some benefits aimed toward prevention.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Checkmaker
Good advice, thank you. I'm totally going to ignore it though because I'm arrogant.
Alright. We all have to make our own decisions in different enterprises about what ruins we are willing to risk in such enterprises, although in this particular enterprise the ruin that is being risked is especially ruinous.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-11-2018 , 02:25 AM
One thing to consider is there is only so much room at the top. Sort of like the top of a pyramid. This is not a big problem in sports because most of the top players come and go on a relatively regular basis because of things like age, injuries, team chemistry, etc.. But with poker, great players can have a 50 year lifespan or more (e.g. Doyle who went deep at the wsop at 79yrs. or maybe it was 80}. The fact that great players seem to play forever causes a big bunch up at the top making it harder for the people at the bottom to break through to the crowded top tier.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-11-2018 , 02:38 AM
Everybody is tougher to beat esp players like serious recs, poor regs. Everybody studies something from the ocean of NLHE training out there.
On Stars everybody got huds.
Smaller edges everywhere.
Rakeback sucks.
Government interference sucks.

You wanna win...you gotta study the cr@p out of it, play with rock-solid mental discipline, get good at various maths-related skill sets. All of these are tradeable assets, that will get you a decent job in a shedload of industries.

Still a fun hobby tho...still fish in the micros, low buyin MTT and live.

Still possible to make a living online for the chosen few, but why the **** bother...many easier and more fun ways to make a crust in 2018.

Just the opinion of a long time rec, who has followed many a failed PGC.
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote
04-11-2018 , 07:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by meltdowncity85
Except everyone who read it understood it probably instantly. I basically never abbreviate like that, really no clue why I did in that post, too much wine.
u cn udstrenad tihs pobrblay ilntsntay 2 bt it dnt mn itz a gd wy 2 witre
Why don't we see any gifted 18-21 year olds rising up through the stakes in the way we used to? Quote

      
m