126

104, son of a bitch test, pathetic thing

omg. answered 14 questions and realized there was 50 questions. way too much hard work to try to impress anyone on an internet forum for me(hungover)

i folded a lot of good hands in the first 14 questions though. lol

got 106 after just pressing answers randomly after nr 14.

is it goot?

yep they do. and even tho some ppl are like KK never ever fold. it quite obviously is a winning play folding there. id find it quite interesting how many ppl stubbornly pressed all in on that 1.

126, i'm such a nit...think i folded way too many big hands with hindsight

191
whoa

131

lol
(i didnt fold a set in the test, if i remember me correctly(except the one @4-way straight))

125, meh, back to the drawing board obv

yah i blow 98

116 (low stakes winner)
I guess its fairly accurate.

heh... i remember doing this test when it came out about 2 years ago... glad to see i've actually 'improved'... but lol at most of the questions being what do you do with a big hand on a dry board in nit-ring, i just guessed they wanted you to fold

A solid 96!!!!!!!!!!!

118. According to this I should be a low stakes winner, but I'm a nano-stakes loser IRL so this test is wrong.

Also this /\

I scored a 142, so now I know IQ test are BS because all the guys in the Medium Stakes PL/NL group tell me I am a idiot, maybe there the idiots?

122, I never fold :/

113...i don't like how it clearly wanted you to fold so many sets on semi-coordinated flops.

lol 122

im not folding a set

also...

[ ] Doesnt matter, its 50/50

Your PokerIQScore is 154

The greatest overall strength in your game is Overall Play. You are better than 99.37% of all people in this area. You have the ability to profit significantly from this skill. Continue to take advantage of it!


God im good!!!

115 but that doesn't really tell the score for me...my strength is simply finding tables full of really bad players in low stake live games and then my weakness is proceeding to have about 15 beers and getting down to their level with monster gambling.

I do think that tourney players (i'm an awful tourney player) are at a disadvantage for this test. Also those of us who don't play hold 'em as their primary game...

I appreciate the link to the answers, btw. Now onto reading for a few hours...

Have to agree here. I kept telling myself, "I know what I should do, especially for this test, but on my 8th beer at the casino, what would I actually do?" I know some of my theoretical folds would have been calls or shoves in real life, though if i was sitting down at a table where half the players were very good and I'd actually have to consider folding a set on the flop or KK preflop as if it were no big thing, I'd probably just find a weaker table.

Guess I'll just have to be happy as a middling donk

One last spam...

I thought the rounders question was hilarious.

"$50/$100 NL. Approx $50,000 stacks. 4 handed. You are a tight-aggressive mid-stakes pro taking a shot at the big game. You have your entire bankroll on the table."

After thinking that 'mid stakes pro' was mutually exclusive with 'entire bankroll on the table' my first thought was, "um, get the **** out of there with my bankroll and not be a super ****tard with bankroll management".

I do not have good bankroll management (well, I play poker causally, so I don't if it even applies) , but 'I'm willing to risk every ****ing dollar I have to take one shot' should be the equivalent of immediately failing the poker ****** test

I lied, one more.

By always selecting 'fold' and giving the same answers I gave before, I was able to score a 97, for what it is worth.