The key to this whole discussion between WCG-Ben is the next:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben86
I do believe I warned WCG that I needed the ok from my partner before proceeding.
Nevertheless, Ben seems to always be kind of ambiguous and vague when he sees an opportunity to get a freeroll. He says "before proceeding" only, not as it should be, "I needed the ok of my partner
to know if I coached Doug in PLO or not"
It gives me the feels that Ben takes advantage of vague and ambiguous sentences to benefit himself, he is "finding ways of exploiting ambiguous or weak areas of the rules in order to gain an advantage over other players." (
http://www.poker.com/articles/angle-shooting.htm)
If Ben says or shows that he
clearly stated to WCG that if X person didn´t agree to the coaching stuff, he wouldn´t continue with the PLO coaching.
If not, the only facts are:
- WCG coached Ben in NL
-Ben didn´t coach WCG in PLO
In other words, a scam.
Last edited by maxicasas; 09-05-2016 at 09:19 PM.
Reason: ortography