I make it a point not to get involved in other peoples pots, especially when i wasnt paying attention for 95% of it and just laughing at the idiot screaming moron in seat 9.

That said, I did privately inform the floor there was a mistake (as did others) and they went to the tape came back and chopped the pot correctly after all the yelling stopped.

Is jungleman back to blackmailing? Or are you just craving for attention and want us to work for the big reveal?

Nobody makes that type of statement without wanting to reveal his/her knowledge. Unless it's blackmailing.

Don't forget that its' ONLY when Ben tried to pay Berri that Berri said "wait, I thought I lost." Berri's not trying to angle here.

As to your confusion above, Berri is simply trying to clarify how much of the rake HE would owe if HE won. Also within that context due to the math, it seems clear he thought he had Sauce's side.

Or is it clear? LOL, I can't 100% tell, but Berri's rake question is a pretty decent index of the things that went wrong here. If Ben truly believed Berri had Trueteller's side, then Berri is wrong about who owes what for rake in the case of wins and losses. Yet Ben agrees that Berri's rake figures are correct. But of course Ben tried to pay Berri so Ben's not angling either.

Berri, any chance you could clarify how the rake payment figures worked out to show that you had Sauce's side in the crossbook?

Like every poker term popularized after BlackFriday it was my dear friend joseph ingram one responsible for it. Hope he does not get shot for it! Bangbang

Dougie boy getting desperate.

lol guys software is not a problem in stakes where 99,9% of the recs play. stars recently banned alot of commercial software u cant even open pokerstove when stars is open wo getting a warning. There is no real time gto software publicly available anywhere and if it were stars would ban it asap. But i guess its easier for flipdascript to blame it on software rather than to admit that he sux.

as SrslySrs alluded to, this guy is a many times previously banned poster throwing around wild accusations. I'll respond anyway.

.


And would be willing to bet FliptDascRipt is this same guy.

obviously the issues aren't the publicly available softwares but the private ones

This is quite the treat for NVG. Just want to say everything that was said about that night in Vancouver is true. I cant recall how much drinking was involved but in hindsight that might've been the trigger to all of this. The night didn't start off badly, in fact it was actully really fun listening to Jason Koons stories back at the condo.

For the record- Doug was not a bully in high school.

yes, but nvgtards act like dream machine software is major problem for them when its clearly not bc they are not playing high stakes.

Did you throw your donger up though?

Look dear, the empirical evidence (High stakes thread in NVG) shows that no such thing as a dream machine is currently available.

Those guys (and I'm talking about the high stakes regs) botch up big hands on such a regular basis that I seriously doubt that they would be able to climb up the ranks if they were to start at the bottom today.

You can choose to believe whatever makes you feel better though.

Ben just filed a youtube complaint on the content and Doug showed it on the stream

LOL, someone who may or may not be Ben86 just filed a youtube complaint on Dougs original vid.

Ben, you got outed for the **** Human you are, why don't you man up and respond. if getting to the top means ****ing over all your friends then i don't want to get to the top.
Big props to doug for calling him out.

and just saw he filed a complaint on youtube, LOLZ he can't get the video taken down just because he is upset it's all factual information unless he can prove otherwise.

Could have been anyone that filed it. Even someone from NVG trying to stir stuff up. Most likely Ben but you never know...

I just dont think, anyone on NVG is just that brilliant to actually do that

dammit, screenshot anyone?

I love the internet so much

Sure, the guy is definitely smart, and if he would file a complaint he would probably do it immediately after the video was published, emotions, anxiety and all that.

Now two days later after everyone has seen it and copied it a person who has decided that it's better to not post in this thread again will suddenly decide to file a youtube complaint against Doug Polk's self incriminating (in a moral and possibly legal sense) gibberish.

Smells a bit fishy.

On the other hand, the fun doesn't end, so I'm happy.

A+, would recommend to friends

Way to insult yourself man.

The way I see it anyone could have done it, including the video uploader.

Someone edit this to 'I'm big online' and it'll be fantastic