Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... WCGRider / Ben86 dispute....

09-05-2016 , 07:28 AM
BEN86 IS CHARGED WITH THE FOLLOWING OFFENSES

1-STEALING COACHING
2-WELCHING BETS
3-USING A BOT
4-RIDING SIDE SADDLE

LET THE TRIAL BY NVG COMMENCE
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 07:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ownage4u
ive thought some and hestitated to post something on the berri/ben topic, but it seems like people seem to misunderstand the situation completely, so im gonna post my thoughts.

first of all, i didnt have any business with berri in the past. i was and am having some business running with ben (basically just a lot of xbooks) and there was never the slightest sign of a problem, he has been very professional from what i can tell. also i have made a lot of xbooks in the past, so i would say i have quite some experience of whats standard and what isnt.


the way ben approached berri about the xbook, everyone who ever did an xbook would agree its super clear bens interpretation is the right one. at no point they discuss splitting the xbook. you guys try to interpret way too much into their discussion about distribution of rake and berris "gogo, thx" and just dont look enough at how obvious the situation is overall. often times someone replied in a weird way to me as berri did here, but its eventually not bens responsibility to make sure berri is actually betting the way he intends to. i usually say something like "you have player x side, i have player y side, 75% xbook, rake is split in blabla way" to be on the safe side, but ive noticed that almost nobody else doing that from my experience.

if i were in bens shoes, i would never accept berri not paying if sauce had won. i cant speak for ben, but it seems very clear to me that 90%+ of knowledgeable xbookers would look at it the same way as i do. i have a really hard time ben would have accepted berri not paying to be honest, it would at least require both
1) ben ruling out any chance berri was trying to freeroll
2) ben being extremely generous

i think what it comes down to is the question whether berri should be freerolled or not for being very unclear. i think the fair solution is clearly this:
if there were say 5 arbitrators, they should look at the event if sauce had won 80k, because thats more intuitive. if they decide ben is clearly entitled to claim the money from berri, it should be the same when results are vice versa, because it eliminates the chance of a freeroll in favor of berri by being unclear.
if the arbitrators decide ben should get 80% of the money, berri should get 80% of the money when trueteller wins 80k.

i can understand how it might seem weird that someone gets paid for a bet he didnt intend to make, but if you look at it in a logical way, its the only reasonable decision. by saying the bet should have been a wash, you assume that arbitrators would have said ben is entitled to get 0% from berri, if sauce had won 80k. that would at least not have happened in this universe.

for the rest of the story, id rather not go too much in depth. berri doesnt come across as a person to me in this thread who should ever do a xbook again and he clearly is responsible for some of the negative events. if you are utterly careless, you deserve to get into trouble sometimes.
that being said, how ben and ike allowed ike to act as an arbitrator here after already having made a decision(!!!!!!), is just beyond me. its so bad, i would have chased you all around if that happened to me.

in the past whenever i was looking for an arbitrator (meaning i shouldnt be friends with that person + the person should be smart and fair, which DOES imply refusing to arbitrate whenever you feel you are biased or already made a decision before being picked lololololol), first names coming to my mind were always kanu and ike. thats a big disappointment, wouldnt have expected something like that
quoted for text book answer
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 07:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dankness3
One thing that really stands out to me about this whole situation goes back to something Ben said on one of his Joeingram podcasts. Joe was asking Ben how much he would charge for coaching and Ben said it would be extremely difficult to come up with a number because so much is going to be learned within the first hour of the coaching. Since Ben received coaching from Doug and did not give him coaching in return after initially agreeing to, I think it's fair to say that Ben stole a certain amount of equity from Doug in doing so. It's probably impossible to say how much the equity stolen was worth, but since both players play the highest stakes in poker it's fair to assume it was a lot of real money.
Ben in the Pod guessed if he had to come up for an hourly rate for coaching it would be about 20k/Hr if Doug coached amount he states sounds like Ben might owe him 150-300k based off his own evaluation and he did even state first few hours would be worth even more.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 08:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Susan_Rub_n_Tug
Ben in the Pod guessed if he had to come up for an hourly rate for coaching it would be about 20k/Hr if Doug coached amount he states sounds like Ben might owe him 150-300k based off his own evaluation and he did even state first few hours would be worth even more.
Thats for PLO though so NL only 10k/h bc only 2 cards
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 08:49 AM
Bumped into Ben once in the venetian about two years ago, didn't speak a word to him, I was stood at the urinal, he came in and stood right next to me to pee even though there were a ton of empty ones. Thought it was pretty weird.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 08:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milky159
RIP Ben
Rip Grainey
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 08:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurgh
Bumped into Ben once in the venetian about two years ago, didn't speak a word to him, I was stood at the urinal, he came in and stood right next to me to pee even though there were a ton of empty ones. Thought it was pretty weird.
he tried this bulliing thing for once.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 08:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurgh
Bumped into Ben once in the venetian about two years ago, didn't speak a word to him, I was stood at the urinal, he came in and stood right next to me to pee even though there were a ton of empty ones. Thought it was pretty weird.
confirmed weirdo who needs to see a professional...

When i make it to highstakes remind me to never befriend another high stakes player, these guys are ****ed up!
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 08:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by coach999
confirmed weirdo who needs to see a professional...

When i make it to highstakes remind me to never befriend another high stakes player, these guys are ****ed up!
no, you should def make friends and scam them.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:00 AM
whatever you guys think, its highly inappropriate to post personal stuff to try and make someone look weird fwiw. actually it puts you at risk of appearing socially awkward yourself
i dont really know what the purpose of the thread is, but it should just focus on the factual stuff in the wcg/ben and berri/ben/ike dispute if anything

as a funny side note, dont underestimate the capability of highstakes players to scam you, not the other way around. you would be surprised how sophisticated some of us can be
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:01 AM
What was the outcome from the berrisweet/ben86 dispute? Be shocking if berri didn't get paid out the 40k otherwise it was one huge free roll for Ben
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ownage4u
ive thought some and hestitated to post something on the berri/ben topic, but it seems like people seem to misunderstand the situation completely, so im gonna post my thoughts.

first of all, i didnt have any business with berri in the past. i was and am having some business running with ben (basically just a lot of xbooks) and there was never the slightest sign of a problem, he has been very professional from what i can tell. also i have made a lot of xbooks in the past, so i would say i have quite some experience of whats standard and what isnt.


the way ben approached berri about the xbook, everyone who ever did an xbook would agree its super clear bens interpretation is the right one. at no point they discuss splitting the xbook. you guys try to interpret way too much into their discussion about distribution of rake and berris "gogo, thx" and just dont look enough at how obvious the situation is overall. often times someone replied in a weird way to me as berri did here, but its eventually not bens responsibility to make sure berri is actually betting the way he intends to. i usually say something like "you have player x side, i have player y side, 75% xbook, rake is split in blabla way" to be on the safe side, but ive noticed that almost nobody else doing that from my experience.

if i were in bens shoes, i would never accept berri not paying if sauce had won. i cant speak for ben, but it seems very clear to me that 90%+ of knowledgeable xbookers would look at it the same way as i do. i have a really hard time ben would have accepted berri not paying to be honest, it would at least require both
1) ben ruling out any chance berri was trying to freeroll
2) ben being extremely generous

i think what it comes down to is the question whether berri should be freerolled or not for being very unclear. i think the fair solution is clearly this:
if there were say 5 arbitrators, they should look at the event if sauce had won 80k, because thats more intuitive. if they decide ben is clearly entitled to claim the money from berri, it should be the same when results are vice versa, because it eliminates the chance of a freeroll in favor of berri by being unclear.
if the arbitrators decide ben should get 80% of the money, berri should get 80% of the money when trueteller wins 80k.

i can understand how it might seem weird that someone gets paid for a bet he didnt intend to make, but if you look at it in a logical way, its the only reasonable decision. by saying the bet should have been a wash, you assume that arbitrators would have said ben is entitled to get 0% from berri, if sauce had won 80k. that would at least not have happened in this universe.

for the rest of the story, id rather not go too much in depth. berri doesnt come across as a person to me in this thread who should ever do a xbook again and he clearly is responsible for some of the negative events. if you are utterly careless, you deserve to get into trouble sometimes.
that being said, how ben and ike allowed ike to act as an arbitrator here after already having made a decision(!!!!!!), is just beyond me. its so bad, i would have chased you all around if that happened to me.

in the past whenever i was looking for an arbitrator (meaning i shouldnt be friends with that person + the person should be smart and fair, which DOES imply refusing to arbitrate whenever you feel you are biased or already made a decision before being picked lololololol), first names coming to my mind were always kanu and ike. thats a big disappointment, wouldnt have expected something like that
Completely spot on, great post
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:11 AM
So a very rich guy takes advantage of others to get even richer, where's the news here?
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ownage4u
ive thought some and hestitated to post something on the berri/ben topic, but it seems like people seem to misunderstand the situation completely, so im gonna post my thoughts.

first of all, i didnt have any business with berri in the past. i was and am having some business running with ben (basically just a lot of xbooks) and there was never the slightest sign of a problem, he has been very professional from what i can tell. also i have made a lot of xbooks in the past, so i would say i have quite some experience of whats standard and what isnt.


the way ben approached berri about the xbook, everyone who ever did an xbook would agree its super clear bens interpretation is the right one. at no point they discuss splitting the xbook. you guys try to interpret way too much into their discussion about distribution of rake and berris "gogo, thx" and just dont look enough at how obvious the situation is overall. often times someone replied in a weird way to me as berri did here, but its eventually not bens responsibility to make sure berri is actually betting the way he intends to. i usually say something like "you have player x side, i have player y side, 75% xbook, rake is split in blabla way" to be on the safe side, but ive noticed that almost nobody else doing that from my experience.

if i were in bens shoes, i would never accept berri not paying if sauce had won. i cant speak for ben, but it seems very clear to me that 90%+ of knowledgeable xbookers would look at it the same way as i do. i have a really hard time ben would have accepted berri not paying to be honest, it would at least require both
1) ben ruling out any chance berri was trying to freeroll
2) ben being extremely generous

i think what it comes down to is the question whether berri should be freerolled or not for being very unclear. i think the fair solution is clearly this:
if there were say 5 arbitrators, they should look at the event if sauce had won 80k, because thats more intuitive. if they decide ben is clearly entitled to claim the money from berri, it should be the same when results are vice versa, because it eliminates the chance of a freeroll in favor of berri by being unclear.
if the arbitrators decide ben should get 80% of the money, berri should get 80% of the money when trueteller wins 80k.

i can understand how it might seem weird that someone gets paid for a bet he didnt intend to make, but if you look at it in a logical way, its the only reasonable decision. by saying the bet should have been a wash, you assume that arbitrators would have said ben is entitled to get 0% from berri, if sauce had won 80k. that would at least not have happened in this universe.

for the rest of the story, id rather not go too much in depth. berri doesnt come across as a person to me in this thread who should ever do a xbook again and he clearly is responsible for some of the negative events. if you are utterly careless, you deserve to get into trouble sometimes.
that being said, how ben and ike allowed ike to act as an arbitrator here after already having made a decision(!!!!!!), is just beyond me. its so bad, i would have chased you all around if that happened to me.

in the past whenever i was looking for an arbitrator (meaning i shouldnt be friends with that person + the person should be smart and fair, which DOES imply refusing to arbitrate whenever you feel you are biased or already made a decision before being picked lololololol), first names coming to my mind were always kanu and ike. thats a big disappointment, wouldnt have expected something like that
This is well thought out and shouldn't be over looked. If you read the Skype log, it's clear to anyone familiar with xbooking what Ben86 implied. There is absolutely no way Ben would've agreed to a partial payment had Sauce won the match. This is not OK and questions Ben's ethics in his business dealings and should be discussed farther between both parties until fair settlement. I don't see why BERRI is not entitled for the full 40k. What matters here is Ben's writing of the xbook proposal and BERRI's agreement on the deal regardless of what the outcome and interpretation was. The bet is booked and it should be paid.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ownage4u
whatever you guys think, its highly inappropriate to post personal stuff to try and make someone look weird fwiw. actually it puts you at risk of appearing socially awkward yourself
i dont really know what the purpose of the thread is, but it should just focus on the factual stuff in the wcg/ben and berri/ben/ike dispute if anything

as a funny side note, dont underestimate the capability of highstakes players to scam you, not the other way around. you would be surprised how sophisticated some of us can be
Spot on. WCG just showed everyone that he is an immature, spiteful and unprofessional person, who people should think twice before doing business with because he can suddenly snap and start shooting Trump style personal offenses all over the internet because he felt offended that for example someone has more money than him or doesn't like his hairstyle.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:13 AM
The evil empire have feelings too guys!

IMO Doug's in the right on the business side of things, but on the personal stuff, no need to air it publicly, this is a competitive game/sport where ego etc will most likely come into play and not everybody will get along


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:27 AM
Oh lol @ Jungle.

But hey, those few hours (max) of specific CAP insight that Ben got from the less than top CAP dog were insanely more valuable than the benefits of living with the HU NL top dog. I mean, your styles are totally different so his transformation to the top had little or nothing to do with your input and of course it was ok for him to later call you out and sit you when he had reached or gone beyond your level Through the roof irony.

Oh man.

Doug is overall a genuine good guy, just a drama queen who needs to realise that life is not a prom.

Ben is a good guy, just a bit too competitive and needs to chill and maybe give up the booze.

Ike is a good guy, but clearly his ability to be impartial is overrated.

Just kiss and make up. Seriously. Apologise in here to each other. Return some coaching favours, pay up on some bets (Berri situ), apologise for personal insults, meet up and don't booze just be adults and talk about how lucky you all are to have good work ethics and for having been in the right place at the right time re: poker. Life is good, girls and boys. Be grateful and be friends.

Actually, I propose that both of you come to Europe and volunteer together for a few weeks in a refugee camp. I'm serious. Wishful thinking that it might happen, but it would be the best solution.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badboi4321
The evil empire have feelings too guys!

IMO Doug's in the right on the business side of things, but on the personal stuff, no need to air it publicly, this is a competitive game/sport where ego etc will most likely come into play and not everybody will get along
I find it amusing how people chose ignore that it was actually Ben who started with the personal stuff. I do not think it is fair to Doug to blame him for this, it almost seems like an intentional needle... did you even read the OP and thread? Like wtf was he supposed to do when Ben started with this? Biased much?
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krataman
I find it amusing how people chose ignore that it was actually Ben who started with the personal stuff. I do not think it is fair to Doug to blame him for this, it almost seems like an intentional needle... did you even read the OP and thread? Like wtf was he supposed to do when Ben started with this? Biased much?


Maybe I wasn't clear on my post.

Meant to read as:
Doug correct on business dealings and if you feel you get scammed or whatever then sure call someone out on it (after trying to resolve privately)

BOTH (not just Doug) should just lay off the personal side. IMO no need to bring any of that into this as overall it doesn't actually have an affect on the business side.

Evil empire comment was purely for comedy. I will try to be clearer in future


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:47 AM
let me get this straight...

ben who is supposed to be a genius cannot grasp the simple concept that it does not matter whether either party actually understands the bet after the bet has been booked?

reading from the chat the bet looks very straightforward- the only person that doesn't understand the bet was berri... but again it doesnt matter if he understood the bet or not after berri said book it.

that plo software isn't capable of solving this super complex problem yet ben??

theres really only two possibilities... ben is a ****ing moron... or ben was trying to scam berri.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:48 AM
Doug - attention seeking drama queen yes - highschool bully? more like he was bullied
Ben - has more than a touch of the private pyles about him - very sketchy
Ike - no idea how he ended up on a pedestal - seems quite shady
Jungle - the world would be a sadder place without him - if he had a reality show i'd watch it
Berri - owed $40k despite not understanding what he was betting on
Sidesaddle GTO dream machine - exists
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:55 AM
If the YouTube video reaches 10k likes Doug Polk will change his hairstyle to something more age/era appropriate.

Last edited by Doorbread; 09-05-2016 at 09:55 AM. Reason: Confirmed by thinking
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjm
lol, wtf...how can the floor just stand there, and say he's shouting loud let's do what he says.

FWIW, I think RBK isn't been scummy, he just doesn't know how to chop a pot. If anything it's more likely Jessie is being scummy, he probably knows the correct chop, but thinks if I stay quiet I get my money back.

Limon stays quiet as well, you would assume he wouldn't want the fun player to get cheated in this spot.
lol you think limon is a stand up guy?

you think rbk doesn't know how to chop a pot after playing who knows how many years of poker?

do you also think hc had no clue how to handle classified information after being a career politician/ high up?
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 09:58 AM
People from USA always being so loud and shouting.. wwhhyyyy
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote
09-05-2016 , 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siculamente
lol you think limon is a stand up guy?

you think rbk doesn't know how to chop a pot after playing who knows how many years of poker?

do you also think hc had no clue how to handle classified information after being a career politician/ high up?
I think limon is an experienced poker pro...an experienced poker pro is going to want the fun player to have the money unless it is going to them.

I have no idea how much live experience rbk has in split pot games where pots are chopped. I've seen plenty of experienced online players not have a clue on the mechanics of chopping pots when playing live. It's a good act if he is pulling an angle, I think it's more likely he thinks what he is saying is correct.
WCGRider / Ben86 dispute.... Quote

      
m