Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ
Yes, I read that thread as well. And thought that anyone arguing that an equity chop was cheating was ridiculous.
I guess I'll just beg very nicely that people recognize that there are at least a few NVGers who are capable of solid intellectual discourse. Pretty please? I don't want to be a ******.
I actually think that everyone in the thread understands what equity chopping is. It's not a difficult concept to understand.
The problem is not in equity chopping, it's that a game where 5 of 6 people have pieces of each other and are equity chopping lends itself to flat out collusion.
It's hard to believe, for instance, that under these conditions that there was never a pot where Guy was squeezed out because two or more of the other players were playing uber aggressively because they know they'd be at least partially freerolling if they got all-in.
What about 3-way all-in pots?
Guy has 34% equity
Player A has 43% equity
Player B has 23% equity
Player A wins. Does player B get any rebate? Or did they just ignore those pots? No one posting about it really knows the details so no one can say definitively that there was 0 collusion going on. At the very least, Player B doesn't lose everything because he has a piece of Player A's action.