Quote:
Originally Posted by Do it Right
PokerStars reputation is outstanding in the exact same sense that FTP's was. Their reputation is terrible, but it is better than most online poker sites. That's no praise to them but a more severe insult to the rest of this industry.
People who completely believe OP are very naive.
People who completely disregard OP are even more naive.
The problem with the last line is if you disregard nobody who has paranoid ideas or fake ideas with an agenda then where do you draw the line in spending time investigating to be sure one is not being naive?
I posted links of dozens of different riggie beliefs, and if the sites shared some of their emails you would see people who believe Stars (or any site) is watching them through their computer and controlling what they do with mind control among other colorful claims. Is it naive to disregard those people as well, what if Stars really uses mind control after all? As much as Pokerstars Michael suggests this claim is absurd (which it is), I am sure he could provide emails from customers that make this one seem almost rational by comparison. Those would be amusing to read.
The fact he commented will make no riggies happy, they will simply suggest that proves a cover up is in progress, otherwise why would he comment? Paranoid gonna paranoid.
Any claim of rigging will get a swarm of generally failed players who will unconditionally believe it (to validate their own failure or to help spread misery to others), but if no real proof or evidence is provided, which would be extremely easy if true in this case, then indeed the claim should be disregarded other than for the entertainment value of watching paranoid people unite in their paranoia.
All the best.