Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin the Chipmunk
The "new school" internet pros liked to brag about how bad the "old school" players play relative to them. They know stuff like stack to pot ratios, commitment thresholds, floating, 3-betting, and all about EV and variance, and how their strategies and thinking come from huge sample sizes.
But then they commit the worst EV plays of all:
1. They put all their eggs in one basket (on internet poker sites)
2. Internet poker was clearly ambiguous legally yet they put a lot of money in them.
Well now, all of the positive EV they got from 3-betting, blocking bets, pot control, and other stuff the "old school" are too uneducated to know anything about have been wiped out by the most negative EV decisions of all: putting most of one's eggs in one basket, namely, online poker and putting it in something that has infinite downside variance.
What irony. When "old School" Doyle laughed at them they got pi$$ed. LOL
1. Having "all your eggs in one basket" does not have any affect on ev it only affects variance (I wish there was some variance to the quality of threads you start)
2. Its not "ambiguous legally" everywhere, even so, many players from inside and outside of the US made a profit even after taking into account bf. Many players did not have everything tied up in ftp.
I'm not even sure what your arguing, players that don't understand the math and strategies of poker are better because they don't have money tied up? Most players in any poker game are losers/recreational players anyway.
I assume your just trolling