Quote:
Originally Posted by Cotton Hill
I'm no lawyer, but as best I can tell from the complaint and my limited understanding of how bankrupcy works their core argument seems to be
In a bankrupcy there are laws governing the order debts are paid back by whatever went bankrupt and they're still owed money and Toby was paid "debts" before them so he has to give it them.
I think that's gonna fail pretty miserably for a lot of different reasons.
If that's the only claim, it could succeed, but then it's not an issue of whether the poker game is illegal. Under the proper circumstances, any number of transactions by a bankrupt estate could be rescinded, including perfectly legal ones.
For instance, there's no law that prohibits you from buying a car from your brother-in-law's car dealership at an inflated price, but if you do it for the purpose of avoiding paying your creditors in a bankruptcy case, the Bankruptcy Court can rescind that transaction.
The claim that does not make sense is one that since the poker game is illegal, he gets the money back. Even if the poker game was illegal, you don't get your money back.