Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Is time to litigate now againsnt the DOJ and prove once and for all poker is a game of skill? Is time to litigate now againsnt the DOJ and prove once and for all poker is a game of skill?

04-17-2011 , 07:41 PM
People are trying way too hard ITT. Most of these definitions of gambling that are being thrown around would mean Insurance companies etc. should be shut down. I invoke the Central Limit Theorem!

In before: What if you only play one hand?

Yeah, what if insurance companies only get one client.
Is time to litigate now againsnt the DOJ and prove once and for all poker is a game of skill? Quote
04-17-2011 , 07:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rizeagainst
You seem to be saying what he posits is far-fetched, unfortunately that's exactly what the Supreme Court of Sweden recently ruled... see the thread in the legislation forum. Not saying it's right but there IS precedence for this view of cash vs tournament poker.
Is time to litigate now againsnt the DOJ and prove once and for all poker is a game of skill? Quote
04-17-2011 , 07:51 PM
I think we should wait 5 more years to litigate like we did last time. the status quo is fine with me
Is time to litigate now againsnt the DOJ and prove once and for all poker is a game of skill? Quote
04-17-2011 , 07:52 PM
Yeah, but the courts in Sweden also said a guy can get disability because he's a metal fan and it interferes with work. http://www.thelocal.se/7650/20070619/

I just wish there was soe way I could get my love of AC/DC and Van Halen to pay off like that.
Is time to litigate now againsnt the DOJ and prove once and for all poker is a game of skill? Quote

      
m