Quote:
At this point, I don't really know anything that the general public doesn't about where the challenge stands. I believe at some point shortly after I stepped away from the whole thing they reached a mutually satisfactory agreement with respect to escrow/guarantee of the bet and penalties, but I don't really know. Jungle (or Tom) can elaborate if they like.
Lastly, whenever I talk about this I think it's important to mention that I bet a lot of money on Jungle's side. I made this clear to Tom and encouraged him to choose someone else to arbitrate but he was insistent that he trusted me to be fair and impartial despite my financial interest.
Feel free to ask me questions.
Thanks a lot for coming into this thread. Even if you are no longer an arbitrator, it's nice that at least someone involved in this whole situation has an actively great reputation in the community as someone fair and honest. Perhaps that is why Tom was so insistent on you being a part of it in the first place so it's sad to see how it played out since.
Do you know Tom's 'big issue with FTP'? Can you elaborate on it? If you do know but somehow can't say more, can you at least explain whether or not you think it is/was a valid reason to not continue playing the challenge?
Couldn't they easily continue it on another site if they wanted to and just scale up the money playing significantly lower stakes if the issue is personal with the site?
What has been your sense of how Tom is acting and what his motivations are in the last year regarding the challenge? Do you feel he is even making the tiniest good faith effort to get this situation to an adequate and proper resolution or is he seemingly just buying endless time and always has something important come up that keeps him from addressing it?
Why do you think he is remaining completely silent on the very public challenge he started? An update and a sincere explanation from him would go a long way with the community so it's disturbing he can't even find 30 minutes to do this.
Finally, and just out of curiosity, if you were to arbitrate a settlement now if Tom said he didn't want to play anymore, would you be likely to rule that tom owes more than then 1.5 million because he is likely a dog in playing out the remaining hands (which I believe is the requirement) or do you think the appropriate settlement would be < 1.5 million?
As I said earlier, I was so appreciative of how Tom acted during the post BF FTP mess. He came off as having great integrity and was someone the community could trust. Seeing it get to this point just sucks.