Your argument was accurate and applicable pre omicron. But the vax doesn’t stop infection from omicron. Though it does protect you from serous disease. Now vaxed and unvaxed are are both spreading it. Since only 35mil are now unvaxed current spread is among the vaxed
I agree that both the vaxxed and unvaxxed are spreading it. However, out of 333 million Americans, 208 million are fully vaccinated. And only 72 million Americans have received a booster.
Many of those who are unvaxxed and unboosted are children of course, and are not eligible yet.
Last edited by 9IronNightmare; 01-05-2022 at 01:58 AM.
It seems that every poster ITT who’s defending Tim isn’t even considering the possibility that he might have actually been vaccinated (as he claims). They just think that the rule was unjust, and it doesn’t matter if he broke it.
Correct me if I’m wrong.
Seems like a bad idea for Caesers/WSOP to let players decide which rules to follow, irrespective of your position on the efficacy of the Covid vaccine.
Regardless of vaccination views - rules are rules, no matter how dumb you think they are.
Gambling age in the UK is 18 - I think it's dumb 18 Y/O's can't play in WSOP. If I faked an ID and went to WSOP and played it would still be breaking the rules, and I am not sure of any player that would disagree that I should be DQ'ed and banned from future events. Can't see how vaccine can be any different.
As much as I disagree with the Rios covid policies I'm fine with guys who used fake vax cards getting perma banned since those are the rules. But you had to know their would be a ton of them being used. If you were super concerned about covid you should have realized that and taken the proper precautions of wearing good masks (which maybe you did) or even not playing at all. I bet the percentage of players who are vaxxed in these Rio games wasn't even that much higher than anywhere else you could have played during wsop.You can think Reilly and people using fake cards are the scum of the Earth but at the end of the day calling them scumbags when it was obvious this would happen isn't going to help you not get covid. We all know these cards are a joke to fake and Caesar's is a dirt bag company that wasn't going to look hard into it or even have their employees vaxxed.
Yeah, I don't disagree with you here borg. In hindsight it was naive to think it wouldn't happen. At the time however, it really didn't register as a concern.
Regardless of vaccination views - rules are rules, no matter how dumb you think they are.
Gambling age in the UK is 18 - I think it's dumb 18 Y/O's can't play in WSOP. If I faked an ID and went to WSOP and played it would still be breaking the rules, and I am not sure of any player that would disagree that I should be DQ'ed and banned from future events. Can't see how vaccine can be any different.
It’s different because for a lot of people getting the vaccine is a political decision, completely unhinged from reason, medical knowledge and concern for the safety/wellbeing of those around them.
Your argument was accurate and applicable pre omicron. But the vax doesn’t stop infection from omicron. Though it does protect you from serous disease. Now vaxed and unvaxed are are both spreading it. Since only 35mil are now unvaxed current spread is among the vaxed
I understand what you're saying as omicron does seem to evade both vaccine and natural immunity better than other strains.
Vaccination does still reduce the chance of infection (albeit at a lower level) which translates to a lower chance of being infectious to those around you.
Also omicron wasn't a dominate variant during the WSOP (to the best of my knowledge).
It’s different because for a lot of people getting the vaccine is a political decision, completely unhinged from reason, medical knowledge and concern for the safety/wellbeing of those around them.
I know the many arguments people have for not getting the vaccine. But I don't know how those arguments make it any more OK to break a specific rule surrounding it?
So what you're saying is because a rule is determined by something that a lot of people don't agree with, that makes it OK to break?
I know the many arguments people have for not getting the vaccine. But I don't know how those arguments make it any more OK to break a specific rule surrounding it?
So what you're saying is because a rule is determined by something that a lot of people don't agree with, that makes it OK to break?
That seems to be part of it. These same people also supported a violent insurrection and attack on the capitol so it’s safe to assume they don’t care about laws anymore.
However, it’s pointless to try to make sense out of a line of thinking that’s completely detached from logic/reason. I don’t think you’re going to get anywhere with that approach.
I agree that both the vaxxed and unvaxxed are spreading it. However, out of 333 million Americans, 208 million are fully vaccinated. And only 72 million Americans have received a booster.
Many of those who are unvaxxed and unboosted are children of course, and are not eligible yet.
I relied on a comment by Pres. Biden yesterday the only 35 million were now not vaxed. It appears at best that was an error. But even assuming only 208 million are vaxed, they outnumber the unvaxed.
I understand what you're saying as omicron does seem to evade both vaccine and natural immunity better than other strains.
Vaccination does still reduce the chance of infection (albeit at a lower level) which translates to a lower chance of being infectious to those around you.
Also omicron wasn't a dominate variant during the WSOP (to the best of my knowledge).
The limited (very limited) protection from contraction provided doesn’t change the math enough. Especially when some of the unvaxed have natural immunity. And though omicron evades that also it is better than that provided by vaxes.
But also the comment I responded to was present tense. It was about now not what happened on Oct/Nov.
Every ****ing thread gets derailed over the vaccine. I think the mods have given up trying to enforce anything here.
Given that a couple of posts were deleted by mods just 10 minutes before you posted this, it would seem that you are mistaken. This is a thread about a faked vaccine card, so it's undoubtedly a little more difficult to know where to draw the line, but if you see posts you think are an issue, reporting them is always more productive than complaining about them in the thread (if you already have, thanks!). If that fails, you can also post in the NVG moderation thread.
Every ****ing thread gets derailed over the vaccine. I think the mods have given up trying to enforce anything here.
There’s really not much to discuss if you take away the pro/anti vaccination arguments.
Tim Reilly violated very clear rules set forth by the WSOP. Tim Reilly knowingly violated federal law by using a fake vaccination card. Any sane person should agree that there should be ramifications for his actions.
Normally this wouldn’t even be subject to “debate” but people have very extreme and entrenched opinions surrounding Covid vaccination.
There’s really not much to discuss if you take away the pro/anti vaccination arguments.
Tim Reilly violated very clear rules set forth by the WSOP. Tim Reilly knowingly violated federal law by using a fake vaccination card. Any sane person should agree that there should be ramifications for his actions.
Normally this wouldn’t even be subject to “debate” but people have very extreme and entrenched opinions surrounding Covid vaccination.
So you also believe those who violated segregation laws during the civil rights movement should have faced legal ramifications? Laws are not inherently moral.
So you also believe those who violated segregation laws during the civil rights movement should have faced legal ramifications? Laws are not inherently moral.
Whether laws are immoral or not does not mean you have a right to break them. Laws are set and citizens have to abide by them. If you don't agree with the laws in your country there are plenty of other countries to choose from.
If you worked for a company that introduced a mandatory vaccine mandate that you didn't agree with, you have two options. Leave your job and work for a company without said rules, or follow the rules. It really is that simple.
Whether laws are immoral or not does not mean you have a right to break them. Laws are set and citizens have to abide by them. If you don't agree with the laws in your country there are plenty of other countries to choose from.
It’s been said many times in many different ways that we have a moral obligation to break unjust laws. I think most people agree with that.
Vaccine-truthers like to believe that their actions are heroic in the same way that MLK Jr.‘s were (see Tim’s post comparing himself to Colin Kaepernick. I’ve also seen truthers compare themselves to Rosa Parks).
Their delusions of grandeur would be humorous if it wasn’t so sad. There’s nothing brave about their selfishness, but they try to elevate themselves by using civil rights leaders and revolutionary figures as peers.
It’s been said many times in many different ways that we have a moral obligation to break unjust laws. I think most people agree with that.
Vaccine-truthers like to believe that their actions are heroic in the same way that MLK Jr.‘s were (see Tim’s post comparing himself to Colin Kaepernick. I’ve also seen truthers compare themselves to Rosa Parks).
Their delusions of grandeur would be humorous if it wasn’t so sad. There’s nothing brave about their selfishness, but they try to elevate themselves by using civil rights leaders and revolutionary figures as peers.
I would like to see some kind of poll on this. I don't think 'most people' think it's OK to break a law under any circumstances. 'Most people' probably DO break laws, but I don't think you would find that they would overwhelmingly agree that it's OK to do so.
There’s really not much to discuss if you take away the pro/anti vaccination arguments.
Tim Reilly violated very clear rules set forth by the WSOP. Tim Reilly knowingly violated federal law by using a fake vaccination card. Any sane person should agree that there should be ramifications for his actions.
Normally this wouldn’t even be subject to “debate” but people have very extreme and entrenched opinions surrounding Covid vaccination.
“There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.”
I understand what you're saying as omicron does seem to evade both vaccine and natural immunity better than other strains.
Vaccination does still reduce the chance of infection (albeit at a lower level) which translates to a lower chance of being infectious to those around you.
Also omicron wasn't a dominate variant during the WSOP (to the best of my knowledge).
Obese people are 46% more at risk of getting and spreading covid. I think next WSOP should have a weight limit as well as a vaccine mandate if we really want to be safe. You step on a scale and measure your height before registering and if your BMI is over 30, you can't play. We don't want people who made bad life decisions to put us healthy people at risk. If we really want to be safe we can't just ostracize the unvaccinated we need to start ostracizing the obese too.
"People with obesity are 46% more at risk of getting Covid-19, according to a study from August."
You guys all do realize that the dealers at the WSOP didn't have to be vaccinated right? The people who had the highest number of interactions with others. But you're all up in arms over one jerk not being vaccinated...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProblemPlaya
His quote is completely valid. Do you have an answer to his question?
His answer is clear. The rules are the rules and if you as a black person wanted to break segregationist laws you deserved to be hit with a fire hose and put in jail.
We can disagree whether the vaccine mandate is wrong or not but let's at least agree that the people violating it aren't common criminals. Whether they're misguided or not, they feel the law is wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProblemPlaya
Now now quit using that logic on us
And no one can refute it because I got the info straight from "the most trusted name in news- CNN".
I want to make it very clear on my anti-obese people stance also, I have no nuance. Even big jacked meatheads who are not fat but qualify as obese should also not be allowed to play in this year's WSOP in my opinion. Because that's science.
Who the eff cares if someone uses a fake vaccine card? Vaccine mandates are dumb in the first place. Get vaccinated and protect yourself from severe symptoms and stop crying about everybody else.
What you're saying might be true for the alpha strain of covid. But the newer strains are more vaccine resistant. And vaccinating the population probably lead to an increase in these newer vaccine resistant strains. That's why mass vaccinating in the midst of a pandemic was a bad idea in the first place. The vaccine should have been reserved for the older and more vulnerable population. Locking people down over the pandemic, reducing their exercise and vitamin D and everyone gaining 15 pounds on average is far more unhealthy than just protecting the vulnerable and going about life as normal.
"A new study from the University of California, Davis, Genome Center, UC San Francisco and the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub shows no significant difference in viral load between vaccinated and unvaccinated people who tested positive for the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. It also found no significant difference between infected people with or without symptoms."