Ok, fair enough. Maybe not 500k. But let's say between 200k-300k is more than reasonable after 10 years?
Keep in mind:
"In March of 2000, I was working as an accountant at Investors Bank & Trust in Boston. I had been an employee there for four and half years."
Average salary of an accountant in Boston? I was going to guess 60-70k, which is pretty much spot on..
http://www.indeed.com/salary/q-Accou...oston,-MA.html
And at this point he'd have 10+ years of experience, plus bonuses, benefits, maybe a cash balance plan, DENTAL, you know. Little things that add up to thousands and thousands of dollars a year. Not to mention peace of mind.
So, can you honestly say that you think he makes more now a year playing poker than he would be if he'd was working at about 10 years of experience as an accountant in Boston? And, lets say its close. In the last 10 years, do you think he'd have done better as a whole?
I think the only person who can truly answer these questions is the OP, with an honest breakdown of
1) what he made as an accountant 9 years ago and we can come up with a chart with approx figures of what he would have made in the next 9 years, not even counting any big promotions. Remember, we count this as an "all-in" number. Benefits COUNT.
2) what he made each year in the last 9 years playing poker. Remember, paying out money for doctors visits and stuff counts against it.
3) the difference between the two.
I would be willing to bet my estimate of multiple hundreds of thousands would really not be that far off. Maybe the number is as low as 200k, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was double that.
Think about it. I'm not pulling numbers out of thin air. I'm sure he had years he made very little money. Maybe he had a year where he made as little as 20k. Do you think he'd have made 20k working in year 7 of being an accountant? Far from it.