Quote:
Originally Posted by Poker?IDontKnowHer
I am neither an antivaxxer or COVID denier. I am just trying to point out the hypocrisy in this type of logic and others like it in this thread. People are ok with unvaccinated players being spared but not unvaccinated dealers. There is no difference between the two as far as contracting and spreading COVID. The difference is a selfish one, less dealers will make it a lot harder, for you personally, to play poker at the WSOP. If it was truly about stopping the spread of COVID in general or limiting your chances of being exposed & spreading to others personally, then everyone would 100% be boycotting this WSOP decision by not playing in October. The WSOP is not a necessity, it is a luxury.
and I'm telling you that there is nothing hypocritical about trying to live in a real world.
Im just gonna repeat myself: I feel like a lot of antivaxxers and covid deniers never understood that it was never about total victory, 0 deaths etc....we're trying to jungle trade offs and adjust risks, that's it.
It's not about stopping covid, it's about getting back to living our lives as soon as possible as safely as possible. If the rights of few morons suffer, so be it, but we need to get back to living our lives.
I want my ****ing luxuries and so should you. And fwiw I'd attend WSOP, or any party, with unvaxxed people too, just because of my risk profile, doesn't mean I wouldn't prefer everyone around me to be vaxxed.
I'm happy WSOP decided they can afford to ban unvaxxed players and I accept that they cannot ban unvaxxed dealers, I really don't see the hypocrisy.