Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
Well the funny and perhaps most hypocrital thing about this is that in early secondary schooling and perhaps even primary schooling you are taught about the theories of chance and probability using such techniques of playing cards and dice.
But then again, I see that it is the South Australian government there and we all know that Labor is about being a nanny state.
On federal politics, it can only be seen as a positive sign for the online gambling community that the government has chosen to remove with Labor's support the pokie regulator as well as other restrictions on pokie gamblers and venues.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ts-own-reforms
Oh dear me no. The gov will pay a price for not implementing these federal protections and leaving it to states - and the amount of donations makes saying why for those opposed to pokies an easy job.
Meanwhile to get "balance" the fed gov has foreign offshore internet gambling, their own pledge on this and no risk of losing significant donations. Online poker is the price paid for pokie legislation being dropped.
You have made a newbie error, you seem to expect consistency or logic from you government.