Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread

12-29-2023 , 12:37 AM
Def substantial money still available to be made at the higher stakes online, but very disheartening to see yet another site scandal >.>

Thankfully we have a documented live reaction commentary from regs on GGpoker when asked how they're feeling based on this new development:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpUWrl3-mc8
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 01:26 AM
Seems pretty blatant like potripper. Who knows what else goes on with superusers that is more disguised.
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 01:39 AM
Massive scandal incoming and everyone is losing their minds to an obvious shitposter. lmao
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 01:54 AM
No he's a living legend. I mean a literal legend.

Could be GG for GG. Ultimate Bet lost almost all its traffic.
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 02:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGSuperUser
User "MoneyTaker69" is alleged to be superusing on GG Poker.

In December, Moneytaker won at 90bb/100 on GG Poker in 8,900 hands playing 53% VPIP. Soon after, he binked a $150 Sunday MTT for $47,586 while playing an extremely volatile strategy, which aroused a lot of suspicion. GG Poker has acknowledged the situation privately and is preparing to address it, but it's important for the public to know immediately due to the significance of superusing.

The Results

The following results graph comes from Smarthand, a site that tracks online poker results. MoneyTaker won at 90bb/100 in December playing 53/17.



Typically, a player with this VPIP/PFR ratio would be in the -50bb/100 range. Even if we were impossibly generous and said he was breakeven, this run would be a statical anomaly. For a -50bb recreational? Impossible.

Here is a primedope simulation of the probability of a breakeven player having this run.


The following is a simulation of possible runs for a player with a given winrate using primedope's variance calculator. The light blue line at the top of the graph represents the "Best" run, which is the luckiest run a person could have in 1,000 trials.

This is a -50bb player playing 9000 hands. Their luckiest run is around -10 buyins. Mokeytaker won 77 buy-ins.


Additionally, MoneyTaker won a $150 GG Masters Sunday MTT, which is a big open field tournament. This makes the possibility of chip dumping or targeting specific players with a virus much less likely.



The Hands

The following hands were collected by various users as examples of likely foul play.







How is he cheating?

Based off his play, the most natural explanation is that he can see the cards. He rarely puts in money significantly behind or calls the river with the worst hand. Also, his winrate is so high that RTA could not possibly explain it.

It's unclear how he's able to see others' cards, and it's possible he's not the only one exploiting a glitch in the system. A post on 2+2 highlighted a group of suspicious accounts that played for brief stints and won for >30bb/100, which is particularly difficult on GG due to their rake structure.

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...postcount=5239

There is no clear evidence that the players highlighted in the above post are superusing, but it's not unreasonable to suspect that this could be a larger issue at scale if done by hackers that want to be less obvious than running >50% VPIP.

Hacker Group


"MoneyTaker" is a hacker group. It's unclear if this account is in any way associated with them or if it's just incidental, but worth mentioning.





What's Next?

As a community, we await GG Poker's response. I'm confident they'll do the right thing and share everything they know about this incident shortly.
Except that his run may not be a statistical anomaly. That’s because when you look at a large population of players there must be someone who is the luckiest, and you can often expect that “outlier” to be off the charts.

In my book Gambling Theory and Other Topics - Expanded Edition there is a chapter on how to possibly identify a possible cheater in a situation like this. The book will be published in about a month, and for obvious reasons I don’t want to post the chapter here. But if a representative from the poker site wants to contact me directly, I’ll share the chapter with the poker site.

Mason
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 02:31 AM
Bruhhh just WTF !!!
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 02:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason Malmuth
Except that his run may not be a statistical anomaly. That’s because when you look at a large population of players there must be someone who is the luckiest, and you can often expect that “outlier” to be off the charts.

In my book Gambling Theory and Other Topics - Expanded Edition there is a chapter on how to possibly identify a possible cheater in a situation like this. The book will be published in about a month, and for obvious reasons I don’t want to post the chapter here. But if a representative from the poker site wants to contact me directly, I’ll share the chapter with the poker site.

Mason
Yeah that's probably what's going on in the linked thread, just top ~0.1% runs from winning LAGs.

Clearly this player is awful and should be massively losing. Definitely losing over -40bb/100, and for that winrate I had to give them a 260 standard deviation just to make their cash game run one in a million. Most players will fall between 80-120, anyone higher than 150 is probably loosing at a lot more than 40bb/100.

Curious if anyone has data for win rates/stddev by player type? I'm guessing even very conservatively their run will be one in a number greater than the world population not even counting the tournament win.

Seems unlikely there's just one super user recently on GG and it happens to be this guy. I would say they're too bad at cheating to make someone at GG involved but clearly that's not true given the past with UltimateBet/POTRIPPER.

Last edited by TripleBerryJam; 12-29-2023 at 03:03 AM.
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 03:07 AM
Not convinced either. Do yo have examples of his "heroic" river folds when he is beat? Would also like to see what his expected ev really is.

His villains play in a similar way like he does in the examples. Isn't GG providing that information on their HUDs? So if villain has LAG stats, maybe don't respect the raises etc?

LAG on a heater until proved otherwise. He winning that tournament probably caught the bigger attention.

Last edited by plaaynde; 12-29-2023 at 03:30 AM.
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 03:13 AM
the guy has 26 wtsd yet happy calls of J2hi and other mega whale calls.

most obvious case ever.
how would you be able to see 'heroic river folds' exactly?
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 03:14 AM
Wow its potripper 2.0.

We need more hands. Gg needs to release all hand histories
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 03:17 AM
reads like a super user haxor who already has an outside source of a lot of funds and is just ****ing around. weird situation no matter what the result/motive/proven or not.

why play peanut stakes when you can see the cards?
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 03:18 AM
Just wanna point out that even in the astronomically rare event that this guy was actually running this good his winnings would be way above all in EV bb/100, according to the data his all in EV matches his winnings almost perfectly, no extreme variance in that part of the graph. I also don't think this was chip dumping because both the redline and blueline are winning massively I would expect just the blueline to be skyrocketing in the chip dumping scenario although I'm not 100% sure on that. Looks like an obvious super user to me.
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 03:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by catangod
reads like a super user haxor who already has an outside source of a lot of funds and is just ****ing around. weird situation no matter what the result/motive/proven or not.

why play peanut stakes when you can see the cards?
'look i can hack ur site, heres the proof, pay me extremely well for the exploit or ur site is fkd'
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 03:30 AM
guy could have just won 1 large tournament without looking like a clown and made a lot of money without the blackmail
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 03:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TripleBerryJam
Yeah that's probably what's going on in the linked thread, just top ~0.1% runs from winning LAGs.

Clearly this player is awful and should be massively losing. Definitely losing over -40bb/100, and for that winrate I had to give them a 260 standard deviation just to make their cash game run one in a million. Most players will fall between 80-120, anyone higher than 150 is probably loosing at a lot more than 40bb/100.

Curious if anyone has data for win rates/stddev by player type? I'm guessing even very conservatively their run will be one in a number greater than the world population not even counting the tournament win.

Seems unlikely there's just one super user recently on GG and it happens to be this guy. I would say they're too bad at cheating to make someone at GG involved but clearly that's not true given the past with UltimateBet/POTRIPPER.
There is a statistical technique that can provide some good information here. And for those wondering, before poker. I did have a career in mathematical statistics.

Mason
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 03:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason Malmuth
There is a statistical technique that can provide some good information here. And for those wondering, before poker. I did have a career in mathematical statistics.

Mason
Everyone was definitely wondering that.
Do you feel qualified to judge an online poker case? What probability do you assign foul play here?
How much would the player have to win before you think it’s over 99%?
Thanks!
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 03:44 AM
The statistics looks very suspect - how reliable is this site for its data-mining? Could it be that it's dropping some hands? I'm not familiar with this site.

I suck at poker but of the 7 hand histories shared, they are all weird sure... but do they look like superusing - as in, he can see the hole cards? 1 of the 7 hands maybe look like it to me. The rest look weird but don't look indicative of seeing holecards. If anything they could be evidence that he can see _future cards_ ? If anything, some of these hands look like he _cant_ see opp cards.

Hand 1 (J2o) - he's behind on flop and barely ahead on turn. Terrible spot to get chips in if you know opponents hole cards?
Hand 2 (85o) - sort of similar.
Hand 3 (22) - V weird hand. In isolation though... he's turning his 22 into a bluff raise on flop, fires turn, fires river.... then spite calls the jam? I mean sure its silly but alone is this super-using?
Hand 4 (T2o) - Obv pre is ridic. But after that, seems like he's turning bottom pair into a bluff that gets a super loose lookup? Is this that strange?
Hand 5 (84o) - :shrug: i suck but this seems fine from both?
Hand 6 (K6o) - so if you could see holecards, you get it in in a 51/49 coinflip?
Hand 7 (K2s) - other than the preflop play, how is this super-using? Flops str draw, calls a bet, checks the turn, calls his straight on the river to a 120% pot shove?


Of course, we have to consider that is this is superusing, or some sought of cheat... then the opponent is _also_ terrible at poker (and at cheating), as you wouldn't go on such a blatant run with these VPIP/FPR stats. So you don't want to overanalyze. but even with v basic knowledge, if you could see holecards, you surely wouldn't pick coinflip spots (K6o pre; J2o vs flush+str draw) to get all chips in?

Last edited by Hood; 12-29-2023 at 03:54 AM.
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 03:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason Malmuth
Except that his run may not be a statistical anomaly. That’s because when you look at a large population of players there must be someone who is the luckiest, and you can often expect that “outlier” to be off the charts.

In my book Gambling Theory and Other Topics - Expanded Edition there is a chapter on how to possibly identify a possible cheater in a situation like this. The book will be published in about a month, and for obvious reasons I don’t want to post the chapter here. But if a representative from the poker site wants to contact me directly, I’ll share the chapter with the poker site.

Mason
Cant wait to read your book to see if I can identify if this person is cheating, I really can't tell if the vpip 50 whale winning at 80bb/100 over 10k hands is cheating or not. Can you mail it directly to my house so I can use the paper for when I take a poop?

Cheers
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 03:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMGClayDol
Everyone was definitely wondering that.
Do you feel qualified to judge an online poker case? What probability do you assign foul play here?
How much would the player have to win before you think it’s over 99%?
Thanks!
When the book comes out you can get a copy and decide for yourself. But to answer your question, I’m qualified to guide the poker site towards the correct answer, but nothing is guaranteed.

Mason
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 04:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jb`
Cant wait to read your book to see if I can identify if this person is cheating, I really can't tell if the vpip 50 whale winning at 80bb/100 over 10k hands is cheating or not. Can you mail it directly to my house so I can use the paper for when I take a poop?

Cheers
Given your post, I suspect you’ll have trouble understanding much of the statistical theory that the book contains:
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 04:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason Malmuth
Given your post, I suspect you’ll have trouble understanding much of the statistical theory that the book contains:
Ah yes that big brain of yours really is something hard to comprehend, like it really is puzzling to me how someone could possibly think that a case of cheating so blatantly obvious is a good opportunity to plug their book as if anyone with any experience with online poker would second guess the OP and the accused cheater. Luckily for me though, I'll only need that paper from that crappy book of yours (pun intended) for when I'm wiping my ******* next so no problems.
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 04:14 AM
Ahhhh finally something that the 2p2 conspiracists can get their teeth into, its been a while.

serious note, the stats look dodgy asf alongside the MTT win, but the hands shown, whilst bad, are not that indicative of superusing and more evidence needed.
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 04:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jb`
Ah yes that big brain of yours really is something hard to comprehend, like it really is puzzling to me how someone could possibly think that a case of cheating so blatantly obvious is a good opportunity to plug their book as if anyone with any experience with online poker would second guess the OP and the accused cheater. Luckily for me though, I'll only need that paper from that crappy book of yours (pun intended) for when I'm wiping my ******* next so no problems.
I plan to give away free kindles when this book comes out. So I’m not plugging anything.
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 04:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason Malmuth
I plan to give away free kindles when this book comes out. So I’m not plugging anything.
So you randomly reference a book that you are going to release soon in the context that it will maybe have some relevancy to this thread and you don't consider this plugging? Also kindle won't work, I'm going to need the physical paper...
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote
12-29-2023 , 04:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jb`
So you randomly reference a book that you are going to release soon in the context that it will maybe have some relevancy to this thread and you don't consider this plugging? Also kindle won't work, I'm going to need the physical paper...
Sorry, you’ll have to buy the printed version.
Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread Quote

      
m