Quote:
Originally Posted by Loctus
I emailed the writer of the article asking for clarification on what happened on the river: If the guy showed his hand before actions were complete or if he just didn't show in the prescribed order after actions completed. Got this, which seems so insane to me:
The article is fairly confusing, and what he says in his response to you makes me wonder if he plays poker - nothing on hendon, but could obv play cash or just never ITM in a tournament. Does the author know what the action was on the river? He says all bets and calls completed, but from the article it really indicates that the player flipped his hand over right after the river was dealt
If 76 was last to act and he was not all in, then Station could prolly void the entire hand for not betting/raising with the nuts
How the money doesnt get in on the river, regardless of the positions, makes me think that there was still action to be completed
If it is a case of literately the "caller" showing his hand before the bettor/raiser showing his at showdown, which voided the hand, then thats redic - but again, 76 would have to be the caller, and he should have to be all in if only calling
Wonder what happens if Station do have to pay out, as not all names/details of all the players at all of the casinos would have been taken