Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteBlow
I was interested where the line was drawn on what was 'reasonable'. If you allow one disabled player and have to get a table to play shorthanded, how can you possibly deny the next, or the next entrant? If you do end up having four or five disabled players. what happens if they end up at the same table? Is it acceptable to discriminate against the 4th but not the 1st, 2nd or 3rd?
I know you didn't ask me, but common sense would dictate that of course there will be a line somewhere, and I don't expect anyone would be able to say with certainty what that number is.
However, if this is all you are after:
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteBlow
But you have to be prepared for such a scenario, as we have been so expertly told ITT.
I get it though, you will never hear a lawyer say ‘I don’t know’ on 2+2.
Then I guess I should leave things between you and Gzesh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfbum983
This all could of been avoided if the caretaker just put in 5 mins of effort before the day long journey.
More than likely, yes. And while I believe those who say no call should be needed are correct, that doesn't mean it's not a good idea, much like I've checked websites or made calls to different businesses before going to see what might be different during Covid (not to equate my personal circumstances, of course). The flip side could be, though, what Venetian marketing has looked like since they've reopened. If they're trying to normalize as much as possible, IE "everything is safe, come back and gamble!", which wouldn't be surprising, people might not think to call ahead. So maybe it's something they didn't think to do, or perhaps they were wanting to see what would happen, as some have suggested.
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfbum983
You can’t tell me that every casino across America is prepared for this situation during covid
Probably not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfbum983
The lawyers are probably thinking going on a grand tour to sue as many as they can that can’t meet their demands on the spot
Meh, that's a step too far for me. I know the reputation lawyers have, but this is pretty cynical. I'm sure we all hope you're wrong.
There's also a middle ground here - people using this not as a lawsuit platform, but as a way to highlight issues. For example, in this case some good could come of it as other casinos hear about it and ensure they have appropriate accommodations available. But maybe I'm just looking through rose-coloured glasses.