Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register

07-12-2019 , 10:46 AM
Club was open only a few weeks. Confiscated tables, chips & money. 3 arrested. Similar operation as Texas clubs.


Last edited by BEANO52; 07-12-2019 at 10:56 AM. Reason: Trying my damndest to get a working link up . . .
Quote
07-12-2019 , 11:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BEANO52
Similar operation as Texas clubs.
IANAL, but after poking around online for a few minutes, the laws in Missouri seem to be a lot more strict. You can't profit in any way from a game, you can't own gambling devices, and if a player derives more than 20% of their income from gambling, they are automatically a criminal. Comparing that to Texas is apples to oranges, imo.

https://www.gamblingonline.com/laws/missouri/
Quote
07-12-2019 , 11:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conan776
. . .Comparing that to Texas is apples to oranges, imo.

https://www.gamblingonline.com/laws/missouri/
The way the club was being run, i.e. seat rental, membership fees etc. is exactly like the Texas clubs. I never said a word about gambling legislation state vs. state.
Quote
07-12-2019 , 11:33 AM
What a bunch of morons. Three major casino companies have properties in Missouri. They'll never allow clubs like these to get started.
Quote
07-12-2019 , 12:57 PM
A friend wanted to go down to play here. I told her after looking into it for under 5 minutes that it would be shut down almost immediately. She argued, and disagreed. Fine.


Weeks later, this happens.

I like how they say "oh, we dont tke rake", but then charge membership fees, seat fees, time fees. Just because you change the name of how you take peoples money, it doesnt change the fact that you are profitting. Anyone who can;t understand that, kinda deserves to have their money taken here.
Quote
07-12-2019 , 02:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsp23
A friend wanted to go down to play here. I told her after looking into it for under 5 minutes that it would be shut down almost immediately. She argued, and disagreed. Fine.


Weeks later, this happens.

I like how they say "oh, we dont tke rake", but then charge membership fees, seat fees, time fees. Just because you change the name of how you take peoples money, it doesnt change the fact that you are profitting. Anyone who can;t understand that, kinda deserves to have their money taken here.
I mean this is literally the same model as Texas...only in Texas a legislative aide found (what appears) to be a loophole by not actively raking. Obviously, this founder didn't do the DD for Missouri, and we'll see if Texas clubs withstand the court system, but to dismiss the idea off hand seems silly.
Quote
07-12-2019 , 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimoser22
I mean this is literally the same model as Texas...only in Texas a legislative aide found (what appears) to be a loophole by not actively raking. Obviously, this founder didn't do the DD for Missouri, and we'll see if Texas clubs withstand the court system, but to dismiss the idea off hand seems silly.
Didn't dismiss it offhand. Missouri law clearly says there can be no profit, rake or otherwise.
Quote
07-12-2019 , 04:07 PM
Texas law says the same thing.
Clubs in Texas have also been raided and shut down.
Some cities allow the clubs to operate.
It just depends on the local authorities.
Quote
07-12-2019 , 05:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mchine
Texas law says the same thing.
Clubs in Texas have also been raided and shut down.
Some cities allow the clubs to operate.
It just depends on the local authorities.
In Missouri's case, it was more on the casinos pushing gaming to get the authorities involved.
Quote
07-12-2019 , 09:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conan776
I ANAL, .....
fyp

Not sure that information is relevant to the ultimate topic, but thanks for posting it as an introductory note
Quote
07-12-2019 , 10:41 PM
Sometimes I pretend it's a horseshoe.
Quote
07-13-2019 , 07:40 AM
The major difference between Texas and Missouri is that the latter has legal casinos who are a pretty powerful stakeholder in that conversation.
Quote
07-13-2019 , 01:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conan776
IANAL, but after poking around online for a few minutes, the laws in Missouri seem to be a lot more strict. You can't profit in any way from a game, you can't own gambling devices, and if a player derives more than 20% of their income from gambling, they are automatically a criminal. Comparing that to Texas is apples to oranges, imo.

https://www.gamblingonline.com/laws/missouri/
Scratching my head...
Don’t understand the unenforceable vague law they made about it having to be a ‘social’ game for it to be legal.
Also what’s up with the 20%? If you bink a tourney you’re a criminal?

Edit - also what if you’re retired or taking a year off work, are you just not allowed to gamble at all since any win would be greater than 20% of your income?
Quote
07-13-2019 , 04:43 PM
I live legitimately a 2 minute walk from this place and it really sucks that it got shut down, but I'm not surprised. I'm gonna be salty about it for awhile.
Quote
07-14-2019 , 07:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott7x
Scratching my head...
Don’t understand the unenforceable vague law they made about it having to be a ‘social’ game for it to be legal.
Also what’s up with the 20%? If you bink a tourney you’re a criminal?

Edit - also what if you’re retired or taking a year off work, are you just not allowed to gamble at all since any win would be greater than 20% of your income?
In the state of Missouri, the answer is yes. There is no constituional right to gamble. The states can decide how little (Hawaii, Utah), or much (Nevada) they want to allow. I will note that retirees get income often from their investments, retirement savings and social security.

The irony of one of Missouri's most famous natives was a major poker player should not be lost. It was said that Mark Twain would earn more money playing poker than he would get in speaking fees when he went on tour.
Quote
07-14-2019 , 02:54 PM
Interesting, TY. Looked into it a bit more and apparently all casinos in Missouri have to be within 1000ft of water, or "riverboats". Can't be land based, although the "riverboats" aren't required to move, and are built to look like they are land based.
Quote
07-15-2019 , 03:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott7x
Interesting, TY. Looked into it a bit more and apparently all casinos in Missouri have to be within 1000ft of water, or "riverboats". Can't be land based, although the "riverboats" aren't required to move, and are built to look like they are land based.
Technically, Lumiere is a concrete boat floating on an artificial basin.
Quote
07-15-2019 , 08:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDHarrison
Technically, Lumiere is a concrete boat floating on an artificial basin.
If you stand in front of Ameristar in Kansas City, you have no idea that thing fits the definition of a riverboat. Except for two goofy pylons. Same for Harrah’s. And Isle of Capri looks so crappy, I would never set foot on it if that was a real ship on the river.

Interesting enough, I’ve read that when they passed those laws in the 90s the commercial shipping industry spent a boatload (pun intended) of cash on making sure that casinos don’t actually swim on the Mississippi or Missouri. Apparently the risk of hitting a real riverboat and harming people on there would have been pretty bad for insurance rates.
Quote
07-15-2019 , 02:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by madlex
If you stand in front of Ameristar in Kansas City, you have no idea that thing fits the definition of a riverboat. Except for two goofy pylons. Same for Harrah’s. And Isle of Capri looks so crappy, I would never set foot on it if that was a real ship on the river.

Interesting enough, I’ve read that when they passed those laws in the 90s the commercial shipping industry spent a boatload (pun intended) of cash on making sure that casinos don’t actually swim on the Mississippi or Missouri. Apparently the risk of hitting a real riverboat and harming people on there would have been pretty bad for insurance rates.
They actually did float for a short time initially. I think it was two hour trips.
Quote
07-15-2019 , 04:20 PM
Some other interesting facts about Missouri "Boats on moats" casinos.

They have to have a life jacket for every person "aboard"
They're required to keep a master licensed "captain" aboard the "ship".
Quote
07-15-2019 , 06:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BEANO52
The way the club was being run, i.e. seat rental, membership fees etc. is exactly like the Texas clubs. I never said a word about gambling legislation state vs. state.



I think only a couple of Houston clubs were hit, and afterwards the press release said from law enforcement that they were raided for being "money laundering operations."

The actus reus here seems to be strictly gambling, so as far as I can tell, that is different in this case.
Quote
07-16-2019 , 09:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hAmThEkIlLeR
I think only a couple of Houston clubs were hit, and afterwards the press release said from law enforcement that they were raided for being "money laundering operations."

The actus reus here seems to be strictly gambling, so as far as I can tell, that is different in this case.
“We are changing the paradigm regarding illegal gambling by moving up the criminal chain and pursuing felony money laundering and engaging in organized crime charges against owners and operators,” Houston District Attorney Kim Ogg said. “Players are not being targeted.”

Not "money laundering" in the traditional sense, i.e. taking mob money and washing it with legitimate business. More like taking "illegally acquired" money and claiming it was "legally acquired".

Money Laundering: The concealment of the origins of illegally obtained money, typically by means of transfers involving foreign banks or legitimate businesses.
Quote
07-17-2019 , 12:19 PM
X-posted from Houston (Texas) thread:

Money Laundering & ALL CHARGES have been dropped by DA.

Article
Quote
07-17-2019 , 10:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by madlex
If you stand in front of Ameristar in Kansas City, you have no idea that thing fits the definition of a riverboat. Except for two goofy pylons. Same for Harrah’s. And Isle of Capri looks so crappy, I would never set foot on it if that was a real ship on the river.

Interesting enough, I’ve read that when they passed those laws in the 90s the commercial shipping industry spent a boatload (pun intended) of cash on making sure that casinos don’t actually swim on the Mississippi or Missouri. Apparently the risk of hitting a real riverboat and harming people on there would have been pretty bad for insurance rates.
Years ago they were boats, and then the Casino Queen got crooked and hit a bridge. The news stations interviewed everyone from the coast guard to the fire department and no one took responsibility for jurisdiction. So, they stopped floating. Then, we wanted nicer places. Lumiere is adjacent to the Four seasons and is built in an old entertainment district on the riverfront. It in now way is a boat. its built vegas style. The proposed Rams stadium would have been built nearby.

they are all near a river, however.
Quote
07-18-2019 , 12:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mizzoulegend
. . . and then the Casino Queen got crooked and hit a bridge. The news stations interviewed everyone from the coast guard to the fire department and no one took responsibility for jurisdiction. So, they stopped floating. . . .
Technically it was the the Admiral that was hit and floated into the bridge. It reopened and operated as normal for years after that accident, as a boat.

Wash Post Article

NTSB Report
Quote

      
m