Quote:
Originally Posted by borg23
Yes it's shocking they don't cater to unpopular games that don't interest people anymore.
We've had this discussion before but basically you want to act like it's men driving women away from poker when the primary reason there aren't that many women playing poker is they simply aren't interested in poker to begin with especially nl and plo which are the games most played these days.
You act like there were tons of women grinding online during the boon and a bunch of sexist savages drove them all away in live poker rooms. Just because yes some women are scared bc of the way some Neanderthals treat them at the poker table that's not the main reason they don't play. It's like you can't accept they simply aren't that interested in poker itself. And guess what- that's the way the world is. There aren't hobbies, tv shows etc that don't have an audience that largely naturally skews towards one gender. Some skew a lot more than others. You honestly believe it if wasn't for a small member of men behaving like idiots we'd have maybe a 70/30 split of men and women in poker rooms today which is laughable.
I've never said most of these things.
I've never said "there were tons of women grinding online during the boon".
I've said there were a lot more women playing
live poker
before the poker boom.
I've never said "a bunch of sexist savages drove them all away" or "if wasn't for a small member of men behaving like idiots we'd have maybe a 70/30 split of men and women".
I don't believe overt sexism is the reason the number of women is declining. There's certainly some overt sexism in poker, but there was likely more of it 40 years ago when there were actually more women playing.
I do believe that many women are turned off by the idea of playing at a table entirely full of men. But I think it's the simply lack of representation in the room rather than active bad behavior by men that is the main obstacle here.
Now, I do dispute the notion that women "simply aren't that interested in poker itself."
You seem to be equating "poker" with "NLHE and PLO", when in fact, poker represents a much greater diversity of games.
I think there is something to the notion that more women may be drawn to limit games than no-limit games (compared to men). But that doesn't mean that women just aren't interested in -poker-. I've played a few different home games where >30% of the players were women. The women were just as engaged and competitive as the men. But we also tried to change up the games with a lot of dealers choice, or running a tournament for a different game each month.
The issue with the popularity of mixed games is that during the poker boom, a ton of people first became exposed to poker by watching tournaments on TV. And NLHE is indeed much better as a TV tournament format than limit games are. So the way that poker rooms brought new players in is to offer them the same game they saw on TV. For a long time, poker rooms (and poker pros) could succeed by bringing in more new players who only knew NLHE from TV than they lost among the old players who loved other games.
But how are new players being brought into the game now? Poker is no longer popular on TV. It's "popular" on YouTube and streaming, but this is almost exclusively among people who are already engaged in the poker community.
I've thought for a while now that the best audience to cultivate potential new players is people who play social games online. And this audience is primarily women!
This audience likes quick, low-stress, but still high-skill games with a social aspect. And this doesn't describe the poker we see on streaming...either the cash games with 500 BB buy-ins, triple straddles, and double-board PLO bomb pots, or the Triton tournaments with time banks, stare downs, and GTO solvers. Yet it does describe low-to-mid-limit mixed games perfectly.