Quote:
Originally Posted by Nostradumas
See, I completely disagree. I've seen footage of the old main events and there were no hole cards displayed - and you know what? It was just as exciting.
You left off two important words from the bolded: "to me."
You may very well have found it equally exciting, to all viewers as a whole, or even poker enthusiasts as a whole, you are in a very, very tiny minority.
Even somewhat recently, with mostly a more poker-savvy audience watching, the WSOP live coverage suffered when it hid the hole cards until after the hand was complete. (It was kind of enjoyable listening to Antonio Esfandiari guess the players' hand ranges, though.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nostradumas
So basically, you're saying that asses in seats are more important than cheating and collusion prevention? I just flat disagree. - What could kill the industry is cheating, not my being able to see hole cards. If the cheating is bad enough, who the heck would want to play?
No one is saying this, because no English-speaking person thinks you have to forgo the latter to have the former. You can have "asses in the seats" while also having a safe system. The key to cheating and collusion prevention is in the effort and resources you put into doing just that.
The WSOP and the WPT have massive operations, much of it running under the auspices of gaming commissions that imposed strict measures. Compare that to Stones Live and Hustler Casino Live (assuming for a moment that HCL did experience cheating), which has relatively low-end productions in a state that does not have any regulations in place to help ensure security for streaming/broadcasts.