Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Should poker have a welfare system? Should poker have a welfare system?

12-19-2011 , 07:14 PM
i'm thinking something like the whole income tax + welfare system that most societies have but instead have it contained within the online poker world.

a progressive tax on winnings + rakeback which would be distribiuted to smaller winners, those breaking even and losers.

imo, it could have great benefits for the poker economy as a whole. it would definitely resulted in increased traffic/play on sites and therefore produce more rake for the sites.

e.g a nl10 grinder with an $800 BR has a big computer problem that will cost $700 to fix. the bigger winners could be forced to pay for this repair and therefore keep smaller winners in action.

this is not set in stone and i am open to other tweaks and suggestions. perhaps overall losers get 0% money back and more goes to small winners.

doesn't it seem unfair when some donk binks a big tourney score which was collected through thousands of players' entry fees and then loses it at a high stakes cash table to 1 or very few players who already have enough?
12-19-2011 , 07:19 PM
Negged.
12-19-2011 , 07:20 PM
Gambling + a welfare system. Lolz.
12-19-2011 , 07:21 PM
Some ideas are bad.
12-19-2011 , 07:21 PM
are you on crack
12-19-2011 , 07:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7824124751
doesn't it seem unfair when some donk binks a big tourney score which was collected through thousands of players' entry fees and then loses it at a high stakes cash table to 1 or very few players who already have enough?
lifes not fair kid, poker owes you nothing
12-19-2011 , 07:24 PM
never put anyone on ignore from 1 post that I've read.. u are the first op lol.

That has to be the one of the stupidest ideas I've ever heard.
12-19-2011 , 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by royce_
are you on crack

+1
12-19-2011 , 07:30 PM
12-19-2011 , 07:31 PM
what if i'm thinking so many levels above you that most can't comprehend. i'm a big ideas guy. like Newt Gingrich
12-19-2011 , 07:31 PM
LOL.
12-19-2011 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7824124751
i'm a big ideas guy. like Newt Gingrich
12-19-2011 , 07:34 PM
Yea, that's definitely something Newt would approve of LOLOLLOL
12-19-2011 , 07:43 PM
Doesnt this already kinda exist on ongame with the "essence" program?
12-19-2011 , 07:55 PM
Am I the only one who read this thinking its a funny level?
12-19-2011 , 07:59 PM
no money in chat room begging, everyone's stolid
12-19-2011 , 08:13 PM
the worst
12-19-2011 , 08:17 PM
I don't throw around the word ludicrous much, but this is ludicrous.
12-19-2011 , 08:18 PM
sign me up i need 50,000 asap
12-19-2011 , 08:19 PM
If you want to donate to a mutual aid society, feel free...but keep your hands out my pocket through government extortion (tax) on the threat of kidnapping (prison).

That is all.
12-19-2011 , 08:34 PM
As for the welfare system - there are many places you can seek for help (for gambling addiction). I see it like that - if there isnt anybody who loses, then I cant win.
Is this thread made for promoting Robin Hood style of approach or communism style of approach (and what the difference in this two styles?)?
And I bet my a** that your either losing, break-even or small winner (so this thread was made because of your greed and jealousy - or maybe your feelings are so many levels above what I can comprehend).
And I hate progressive tax system - another topic.
12-19-2011 , 08:46 PM
Losers gonna lose
12-19-2011 , 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7824124751
i'm thinking something like the whole income tax + welfare system that most societies have but instead have it contained within the online poker world.

a progressive tax on winnings + rakeback which would be distribiuted to smaller winners, those breaking even and losers.
12-19-2011 , 08:50 PM
No.
12-19-2011 , 08:53 PM
if anything low limit games should be eliminated so people can't practice and train for years for mid and high stakes
Closed Thread Subscribe
...

      
m