I mean because the thread gets dozens of pages of a lot of nonsense (I'm sure there is some true stuff) people come in and say I haven't replied/don't reply/hide etc. Its just not true.
When it went on twitter I think I replied within 10 minutes, I came to the thread and replied, captain Kelvis replied within 1 minute and his ridiculous army just instantly troll here, blog everywhere else, I gave a really really long message addressing everything, he said clear off, not welcome and I happily depart, the same army continue and then new army say well if Pads doesn't reply must be guilty.
I'm not going to just keep coming on and on saying the same thing over and over again. Its pointless and I think when a thread gets like that mods should probably step in and end it/delete trolls.
I'm not sure how I'm supposed to even address this kind of thing.
"pads doesnt fund bitb, he is just face for them so they can get good deals from party" what do you really want me to reply to this?
Either
a) I don't reply and people think you're guilty
b) You reply saying no and they say thats what a guilty guy would say
c) You're guilty and say you do
Theres no real way to win as the respondee.
I'm happy for any of you to come and speak face to face and ask questions, or tell me what you "know" about me and what I think about everything. The first thing I said at party was that when I'm an ambassador for the site, I'll speak when I want to speak and not stay quiet on twitter to somebody if I think they've scummed or in situations like this, because I don't like to hide anything.
There's so many mistruths and misinterpretations about BRS its ridiculous. A lot of it in the threads are so obvious, new poster account posts, less than 1 minute later a older account leader the witch hunt instantly replies, either they truly do only care about this in their lives or they are using both of the accounts. What is the point of replying to 10 people with 1-5 posts and then for them to be satisfied for a full new army of 1-5 post people saying the same things, the thread is just running like that.
I think one of the last posts I read was the only screenshot I've seen, it was facebook and in some random font talking about satellites and it was from 2016?? This looks bad because I should know more, but not only do my players not play there, I don't even know if it was around in 2016? I thought this (PPL Leaderboard) all started in January this year
I would actually love to do a talk at a live event on stables, misconceptions, listen to other peoples views, have a nice debate, show infrastructures how it works etc. I think people would actually be interested and would understand why stables have ADDED millions and millions of dollars to the ecosystem not TAKEN.
If some guy is playing $5.50 satalites getting the whole tree started playing every day and helping all the games run. 1) He probably isn't a world class player, 2) He is not effecting anybody at all, he isn't playing against/vs the high stakes guys, and he's helping the smaller things run. If he changes his $49.50 winnings into a $33 and $11 mtt ticket I'm not sure who it negatively effects anyway.
I think honestly how I see BRS is its a bunch of guys you would see very often in casinos, who have started playing volume online. They generally play 1-2 stakes higher than they perhaps would do playing for themselves or where their current volume is. A $33 really solid mtt player can be a biggish loser at a $109 MTT for example. Apparently they have had 2000 players it keeps getting said here? So there is 2000 players basically playing a little bit higher than they should be, helping games run at all levels, playing every single day, going and supporting live events and grinding a lot online. A lot of comments about this:
1- If RIO, Stars or anybody else could get an affiliate with 2000 players starting every game on the site and playing in games they weren't profitable in they would instantly be the best affiliate in the world and it wouldn't be close at all.
2- If you ever have a turnover of 2000 players there is always going to be rotten apples. I have had people steal from me and we have way way way less players. Having 2000 people sure one or two may collude together, thats just how life is, all of the people I've met from BRS have been very, very nice. I actually really liked watching Moz twitch stream, he was often playing high stakes and vs me and others and he would be "trying to save up enough PPL to fire x/y/z" I liked it, young, hungry English normal lad who grinded really hard. It's unfair to group them all bad apples, just like its unrealistic to assume they are all as nice as he is.
3- Stars give free packages out to different things, but not to me or friends in bitB. Am I offended or think that its unfair somebody else gets something I don't? No. I have guys who play 1200 games a month and guys who play 200 games a month, if Stars or party or anybody think my guy with 1200 games is an amazing player from the site and want to give him a bonus of a $30k package, or if they want to give him an extra 15% rakeback for 2 years thats fine, thats not because hes in bitB, its because of who he is and what he brings to the site.
4- If a site gives a bunch of players free hotels in bahamas or Prague or somewhere but my guys have to pay the $300/night then suddenly those groups of players can have way more profitable trips, is that unfair on my guys? Should the site even tell my guys that they are giving hotels to the other guys. If hotels is fair, is 10% extra rakeback/week over 2 months equalling the price of the hotel fair? If not why?
Like I said all along, I wish I just made affiliate deals with every site, I bring them 300 players every day, I'll gamble with them and put them in bigger games, if you don't give me the extra 25% rakeback for each guy I take them away from your site and give them to somebody else. I would be rich enough to fund bitB if I had done that!! I have no deal with party, no deal with stars, no deal with 888, no deal with acr, no deal with anybody, we have raked 10m+ probably, it would have been the clever thing to do, but we didn't do it. We favour certain sites over other sites, we gamble harder on certain sites rather than others, if a site has overlay we are more likely to fire it hard. There is nobody from any site telling us there is overlay and to put people in to x/y/z, sending $109 tickets etc.
https://gyazo.com/e754cb1df8e9a80c5bc8ba2f838502f5
Not sure if link works, but its a channel we have called monitor overlays, its the players themselves who look out for them and tell eachother, you can see its not only party. If 888 had huge overlay there and 60 of our guys jumped in last second it wouldn't look dodgy, but because its party it would look like it, I understand, but obviously theres no way for me to prove. So not sure what else I can do than come back in this thread every 100 posts and say "nah, this is what I think about the situation" I'm working on being open minded, but in this case I think I very sure how I feel about it and how sad I am about not being the richest poker affiliate of 2018!
Last edited by OurSurveySays; 11-01-2018 at 06:41 PM.