Quote:
Originally Posted by allenglenn
My apologies for not including this in my previous post. I would like to direct this to Mr. Greenstein. It is not that anyone feels that you are anyway, even remotely involved in this travesty. At least I don't. It is your attempt at journalism and then editorializing on the subject that is upsetting people. The problem is that you have a rooting interest in this mess, and I don't think you can disagree. Your rooting interest is the hope that poker will grow and grow. I have the same interest. However, I am not a professional poker player. You, however, are. You have sponsorships, that I definitely know. Whether you have stock options or not, I do not know. Being a bright man, you know how badly this scandal is going to effect the face of poker. The boom poker experienced after Moneymaker's win will soon evaporate. I think once the story airs on 60 Minutes it is going to have such an adverse effect on the industry that many sites will go belly-up if they haven't already. Poker rooms around the country will go back to their pre-Moneymaker numbers. What brought people out of the woodwork after Moneymaker's win was the thought, "Hey, that could be me!". After this scandal, those same people are going to say, "It's all rigged!" And this will negatively effect you, Mr. Greenstein, and their inlies your conflict of interests. So, I will reiterate and elaborate what I said in a previous post about poker professionals commenting on this situation. All you can do denigrate cheating and all of its forms. When you are essentially trying to tell people that in this country, you are innocent until proven guilty, whuch is true, people hear that as a comment defending Hamilton. Its unfortunate, but you are in a no-win situation any time you want to add your opinion on the matter. Also, this is not a matter whose outcome will be determined in any courtroom or by any sanctioning of individuals or companies. It will be decided in the court of public appeal.
allenglen,
You are not even close to accurate about my motives and neither are my other critics in the thread, who fortunately are in the minority. I just want to get to the truth. It will have no affect on me or the future of poker whether we find out that Russ is the matermind or that it's someone else or some group of people.
I think the way you guys are going about it, you would rather hang Russ than find out if he is really behind it. Russ is no friend of mine. But I can't believe that he is alone if he is guilty. I certainly see a lot of circumstantial evidence that Russ is part of this scheme, but you guys are so illogical, that you force me to take an opposing view in the way that Henry Fonda did in 12 Angry Men.
As I mentioned, I have had the privilege to talk to people involved in the 60 mminutes investigation and they aren't going to simply say "The KGC and the court of public opinion say it's Russ, so we should go with that and look no further."
If I was only concerned about my reputation and the future of poker, I would pin it all on Russ because that is the quickest and simplest way to go. But I want to be a little more careful and intelligent about this, so I won't choose that route.
Barry