Quote:
Originally Posted by persianpunisher
Who assumed he did it? Who cares if someone did assume that? By your metrics, we can't even discuss it until there's a trial and ultimate guilt or innocence is proven.
If you want to be mad at anyone, it's Daniel for bringing it up if it's not true.
This is why the U.S. legal tenet of presumption of innocence until proven guilty is naively idealistic but in practicality a joke (at least for many) imho. If someone is
truly innocent, most levels of society all the way up to the courts/jails still
treat a presumably innocent person as guilty from the start. Personally, I think when one is arrested, then brought into a jail cell and then forced to fork over money by placing bail (if he/she can afford to even do so) is a very very crappy way of how a "presumed" innocent person is treated in the first place imo. Would you want to be treated that way if you knew you were truly innocent? Any sane person would think "of course not, no". Especially in this internet and tv age with 24 hours news cycles, society already quickly condemns guilt unofficially. Might as well be technically guilty in terms of U.S. law from the start and work from that. That is why I have no problem with European pragmatism here - guilty until proven innocent.
Uh oh. Did I commit another 2+2 sin on here? I have to go to confession now because I terribly "DIGRESSED". The plucking horror!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by HurtLocker; 09-23-2021 at 01:03 PM.