Quote:
Originally Posted by TomVeil
Not to mention that without the giant processor fees that the sites were forced to pay, you'd likely see a lower rake.
I don't understand this argument.
Sure, there won't be giant processor fees, but what'll stop sites from charging a 10% rake?
It's going to come down to what they can get away with. Most people obviously play for entertainment and are happy to play fundamentally -EV games, as they do in casinos.
Only 1% or less of the player base would complain about an unbeatable rake, so it's going to come down to a simple calculation:
Cave to the whining of 1% of their players and lower the rake, or tell them to **** off and keep an unbeatable rake that 99% of their players neither know nor care about.
Gonna take a business genius to figure this one out, it's really close....