This is one of the (many) things that confuses me, are they saying that all 3 sites used exactly the same techniques in this so-called fraud? Seems a bit coincidental if so, you would expect certain charges to be directed to certain sites rather than this kind of blanket charge sheet.
I think the money laundering laws are worded so the activity being funded has to be illegal, and I haven't seen anything that explicitly states that online poker is illegal in the USA (see this thread for references
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/29...t-etc-1025264/). So this is presumably the besthope for the defence. In the best-case scenario, they are forced to admit that having trawled through their vague legislation they are unable to prove it is illegal and then it's game on again. And you can be sure the sites will fight hard with so much at stake.