Quote:
Originally Posted by golfbum983
Unlimited bankrolls + coaching, sharing databases of hands, colluding + ghosting on deep runs from crushers too name a few
From the players perspective can turn into a slavery contract if get down deep in mu
- i dont think anyone outside of trust fund babies actually has the bankroll to grind HSMTTs and high rollers regularly. no different from elite portfolio managers needing outside investment to make big money at a hedge fund
- imagine running a stable and then not ensuring your horses have adequate coaching or improvement. sounds like a shitty stable.
- colluding or ghosting sounds like fake news, bad regs love to cry about this but nobody has ever proven it. if they did pads would get ****ing ban hammered. prove it if i'm wrong.
- players can negotiate deals beforehand that don't put them into slavery, don't blame pads if the horse agrees to a shitty deal
Quote:
Originally Posted by gh0ulpatrol
They take (more) money out of the poker economy.
They take players who are good, give them free coaching from elite players and stake them into games that are bigger than they would normally play.
LOL at being mad because they take more money out of the poker community, that's the idea genius
2nd part is totally normally too, wut? imagine having the capital to turn good players into great players and print a 20% ROI and not doing that.
ITT ppl mad at innovation/evolution. sry friendos, your idea of a poker mtt harmony where everyone plays their own bankroll and stays isolated from each other isn't happening. if your dreams came true then partypoker would prob have to lower their 1MM guarantees down to 200k guarantees and then you'd be mad at sites for not attracting enough customers. stables generate rake, so long as they don't crush the ecosystem too quick they will always be valuable to site operators. pads feels like the sheep is getting shorn too aggro.