Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ray Bitar (FTP CEO) Surrenders to US Government - Confirmed by DOJ Ray Bitar (FTP CEO) Surrenders to US Government - Confirmed by DOJ

07-02-2012 , 09:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mondogarage
I mostly agree with, except for one thing. Well, two things. One, he would not have known of the sealed indictment. He may have been warned by his lawyers that such a thing was possible (and he'd be a fool not to think it was possible, given the conduct alleged in it).
I said this hours ago. http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...&postcount=379. I'm going to applaud myself on the great read on exactly what the US Attorney's argument was for not letting him out on bail, before Diamond Flush told us.

It seems that the DOJ probably refused to agree to a settlement until he turned himself in. So he could have sat back and tried to get them to concede to adding more charges, which they wouldn't, or he could realize he is beat and fold his hand and not put all of us through any more misery than he already has, which is what I think he did (while hoping they didn't add charges, but knowing it was possible).

I'm just crossing my fingers they aren't playing that kind of hardball with Isai, though Isai is in the category where "he just thinks he might be facing 1-2 years of jail time" as the US Attorney stated about Bitar today.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoTheMath
Bitar and his lawyers knew that the DoJ might file more charges. (They asked the DoJ to confirm that this wouldn't happen and the DoJ declined to do so.) Bitar (and probably his lawyers) know what he has done. They know the DoJ has access to FTP's records and can guess there are people talking to investigators. While Bitar didn't know exactly what was coming, he had to have had a fairly good idea. Or he's stupid and doesn't have a very good grasp of reality and consequences - but there's no evidence of that.
DTM- You have one of those dry humors right?
07-02-2012 , 09:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudd
Aren't these new charges all relating to the fraud Full Tilt committed by maintaining that player funds were safe and segregated while spending them like drunken sailors? Assuming Pokerstars is as squeaky clean on that front as it appears, I don't see why this should concern them, and UB obviously doesn't care since they seem to be in the wind anyways.
It was a very general concern just having to do with the general way things went down.
07-02-2012 , 09:40 PM
what im wondering is... even if stars really want to buy ftp and everything, are we gonna have to wait until the trials of bitar & co to be over?! -_-
07-02-2012 , 09:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirbynator
what im wondering is... even if stars really want to buy ftp and everything, are we gonna have to wait until the trials of bitar & co to be over?! -_-
No.
07-02-2012 , 09:43 PM
These were all new criminal charges today, correct? A settlement of the civil charges against Full Tilt/Stars would be where we'd get our money back
07-02-2012 , 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoTheMath
Bitar and his lawyers knew that the DoJ might file more charges. (They asked the DoJ to confirm that this wouldn't happen and the DoJ declined to do so.) Bitar (and probably his lawyers) know what he has done. They know the DoJ has access to FTP's records and can guess there are people talking to investigators. While Bitar didn't know exactly what was coming, he had to have had a fairly good idea. Or he's stupid and doesn't have a very good grasp of reality and consequences - but there's no evidence of that.
This 100%. Bitar's lawyers knew something like this was coming when DOJ declined to confirm there would be no new charges. He didn't show up and get blindsided. This doesn't figure to affect any pending deal with regard to player repayment. Of course, until we have any details about what the terms of that agreement are, we still have no idea how close the deal is to being completed. If you haven't guessed....maybe we'll know more in a few weeks.
07-02-2012 , 09:44 PM
opc orn:
07-02-2012 , 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZBTHorton
No.
praise da lord.
07-02-2012 , 09:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZBTHorton
No.
Do you think that the deal will happen?
07-02-2012 , 09:52 PM
Ray Bitar Surrenders in New York City, New Charges Filed [diamondflushpoker.com]
...Devlin-Brown made the argument to the judge that there was no amount of money that could sufficiently guarantee that the defendant would not flee. He also pointed out that while the original and prior superceding indictments left all defendants with a sense of merely facing a year or two in jail if convicted, the new charges now facing Bitar could conceivably result in decades of incarceration. Therefore, Devlin-Brown argued, even though he came in voluntarily now, his feelings could change, causing him to flee...
Bitar was already facing 65 years in prison. Any possible sense of "merely facing a year or two in jail" came from the DOJ plea bargaining multiple felonies (6) with the possibility of decades (5) in jail to a misdemeanor and 3 months in jail (Campos).
07-02-2012 , 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedsToBeSaid
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
Yes. The original FTP fines were made before the doj knew the specifics of their financials. These fines have nothing to do with FTP being a profitable business. They were not.
jfc will you stop lying?
The allegations in the superceding indictment indicate that FTP had not been profitable since sometime between late 2007 and early 2010. Probably not since the end of 2008. They paid out distributions of ~$10M per month. In August 2010 they were short of obligations to players by ~20 months' distributions. This does not include their additional obligations to other creditors which were probably on the order of one to three more months' distributions. While FTP may once have been profitable, they were not a profitable business at BF and had not been so for some time. markksman is not lying, and I don't think you are either.
07-02-2012 , 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O Falsidico
Do you think that the deal will happen?
I'm cautiously optimistic.
07-02-2012 , 09:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O Falsidico
Do you think that the deal will happen?
At least Bitar thinks it will happen. This guy knows more about the deal than all of us combined.
07-02-2012 , 10:00 PM
So what is the "USAO"? If Bitar is no longer able to negotiate with stars, then who is? What's happening on that front?
07-02-2012 , 10:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoTheMath
The allegations in the superceding indictment indicate that FTP had not been profitable since sometime between late 2007 and early 2010. Probably not since the end of 2008. They paid out distributions of ~$10M per month. In August 2010 they were short of obligations to players by ~20 months' distributions. This does not include their additional obligations to other creditors which were probably on the order of one to three more months' distributions. While FTP may once have been profitable, they were not a profitable business at BF and had not been so for some time. markksman is not lying, and I don't think you are either.
He has repeatedly stated that FTP never made any money. He has been corrected dozens of times. He is lying.
07-02-2012 , 10:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShipItYo
So what is the "USAO"? If Bitar is no longer able to negotiate with stars, then who is? What's happening on that front?
United States Attorney's Office
07-02-2012 , 10:04 PM
Let's assume Pokerstars makes the deal happen and the US finally allows online poker nationwide. If Pokerstars is allowed to play in the US again, does anyone else besides me have reservations about giving them my money?

Yes they did pay me back, but their morals were loose enough to defraud banks in the US so they could stay open to make more money. It's a slippery slope once you start breaking the law. Just ask Ray Bitar.
07-02-2012 , 10:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mondogarage
Not scammed...outplayed. A felon on the run is always -EV against the DOJ, once you get past small sample size...
Not scammed or outplayed ... slowrolled.
07-02-2012 , 10:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vee Quiva
Let's assume Pokerstars makes the deal happen and the US finally allows online poker nationwide. If Pokerstars is allowed to play in the US again, does anyone else besides me have reservations about giving them my money?

Yes they did pay me back, but their morals were loose enough to defraud banks in the US so they could stay open to make more money. It's a slippery slope once you start breaking the law. Just ask Ray Bitar.
Then i guess you should move to Cuba
07-02-2012 , 10:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudd
Going to be tough to do without his passport
Are you serious????????? lol
07-02-2012 , 10:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by novahunterpa
If I'm the CEO of UB and PS this doesn't bold well as they must be ****ting their pants expecting more charges against them at some point.
The new charges all have to do with the fraud against players. Scheinberg has no worries in this regard. Scott Tom ought to be worried.

If the flight risk allegation and the bail conditions came as a big enough surprise, Scheinberg and his crew may be concerned about how square the DoJ is being with them however.

While Bitar agreeing to surrender seemed to signal an imminent deal, if the DoJ pulled a fast one, it might slow a deal down while the Stars folks try for additional guarantees. However, we don't know for sure that today's drama was an example of the DoJ pullling a fast one.
07-02-2012 , 10:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vee Quiva
Let's assume Pokerstars makes the deal happen and the US finally allows online poker nationwide. If Pokerstars is allowed to play in the US again, does anyone else besides me have reservations about giving them my money?

Yes they did pay me back, but their morals were loose enough to defraud banks in the US so they could stay open to make more money. It's a slippery slope once you start breaking the law. Just ask Ray Bitar.
Serious question: Did you really think, prior to Black Friday, that Pokerstars was 100% on the up and up operating in the USA? I know some people used the "well, poker isn't really gambling..." line to justify the sketchy behavior, but it seems off to me that you'd think they were 100% within the law before.

Choosing to play there before and not choosing to play there in the future isn't punishing them for breaking the law imo, it's just punishing them for getting caught.
07-02-2012 , 10:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by novahunterpa
Yeah, It appears from DF article that for a few weeks Bitar was trying to get the USAO to agree to no further charges in exchange for Bitar coming in. The USAO would give Bitar any such agreement. Looks like Bitar decided to gamble by turning himself hoping there wouldn't be any other charges.
This was my impression as well but Im having trouble wrapping my head around it. Like wtf could Bitar have been thinking? The DOJs goal is to get him back here to charge him, right? So if he tried negotiated out the possibility of these hidden charges, the DOJ refused to negotiate, and he still came back? It seems like if there werent sealed charges the DOJ would instantly concede that point to get him back and charge him for what they had.

Doesnt make much sense that hes been blindsided by these charges imo.
07-02-2012 , 10:13 PM
Bitar arrested. The Higgs boson found. And Anderson Cooper is gay!

Been a big day.
07-02-2012 , 10:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charmer
This was my impression as well but Im having trouble wrapping my head around it. Like wtf could Bitar have been thinking? The DOJs goal is to get him back here to charge him, right? So if he tried negotiated out the possibility of these hidden charges, the DOJ refused to negotiate, and he still came back? It seems like if there werent sealed charges the DOJ would instantly concede that point to get him back and charge him for what they had.

Doesnt make much sense that hes been blindsided by these charges imo.
The problem your having is the underlying assumption that Bitar was unlikely to be extradited from Ireland.

      
m