Quote:
Originally Posted by flash237
What if we all wrote letters to the nevada gaming commission suggesting they deny IGT's licence application? IGT owns the entraction network and is a 5billion dollar US public company. They allowed purple lounge to steal from us and have also taken no responsibility. Not the kind of network I think should be getting a US license.
If they felt there was a chance their license was in jeopardy maybe they would step up and do the right thing.
I was planning on attending the NGC meeting tomorrow anyway.
However, there is ZERO chance the IGT online gaming application will not be favorably acted on by the Commission.
Nor should it even be delayed. This is a time to educate and discuss the issues, not foolishly try and threaten someone who "could" be of assistance.
(As generally happens, no one hurt by this lapse by Entraction stepped up to represent aggrieved poker players in this matter, despite an opening to at least perhaps get IGT on record as to their responsibility or not for past operation by Entraction of their purchased Network, outside Nevada.)
The opportunity to approach IGT in a regulatory context is not lost forever, however. IGT is up for approval as a manufacturer and should be approved; there will be an opportunity to comment later on appropriate rules to operate a poker network, a new concept for Nevada.
This is especially so where a network might face player liability/integrity claims arising from the conduct by non-Nevada skins it supports.
I would be willing to consider work on that angle, of lobbying for rules ensuring network liability for skins' players, ..... but not for free.
pm me if you want to discuss this matter.