Quote:
Originally Posted by punter11235
This is not comparable. If you are fat losing weight is likely beneficial for you even if you don't eat anything until you get there. It's pretty safe unless you have preexisting conditions already. Even if you do that with (reasonable) help of drugs you are still better off at the end of the bet as being fat is bigger health risk than few months of cocaine or amphetamines not to mention other life quality benefits. The only problem is that one of the had to fatten up to win it, other than that it's healthy motivating competition.
In OP though you are wasting 30 days of your life to be guaranteed worse off health wise at the end of it not to mention some risk of lasting damage. It's basically "cut your finger off and I will give you 100k" kind of deal. I think the chances of him making it though are reasonable. I wouldn't bet on him 1-1 but freaks who agree to those deals often have amazing amount of will power and sheer persistence.
Somehow I think you're making a case for why there should be concern?
Personally, these types of prop bets and their ties to poker have worried me since 2007.
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/5...-tonight-8033/
I'm no expert on alcohol or health, but I don't believe I have to be to point out what's obvious?
EDIT: This is what's already in effect in the UK for "gambling" marketing. It may not specifically apply to other jurisdictions, but influencer marketing is a big topic these days -- specifically in the gambling industry. And existing laws/guidelines often have influence on incoming regulations.
https://www.asa.org.uk/type/non_broa...ection/16.html
16.1 Marketing communications for gambling must be socially responsible, with particular regard to the need to protect children, young persons and other vulnerable persons from being harmed or exploited.
16.3.1 portray, condone or encourage gambling behaviour that is socially irresponsible or could lead to financial, social or emotional harm.
16.3.4 suggest that gambling can be a solution to financial concerns, an alternative to employment or a way to achieve financial security.
16.3.9 portray gambling in a context of toughness or link it to resilience or recklessness.
These rules apply to gambling operators and their affiliates/collaborators. I'm unsure if the prop bet would be promoted/shared by a poker site, but even if it isn't, this prop bet seems irresponsible?
Last edited by dhubermex; 11-26-2018 at 08:24 AM.
Reason: See EDIT