What will he do if he coaches his definition of non Asian, non white people but finds that a very high percentage of those he coaches don't make the grade, blame it on variance?
Will he be means testing which non white, non Asian people can get his free coaching.
For example if Bill Perkins requests the free coaching, will he allow him to have it? Come to think of it, does PH class Bill Perkins as non white, non Asian?
Has he even considered that maybe, just maybe certain ethnic groups have a greater aptitude and/or drive, or historical cultural influences in certain fields of endeavour than other ethnic groups?
Has he even done any research into it?
https://www.asianscientist.com/2016/...maths-science/
Why are there so many Jewish accountants but hardly any Jewish builders (construction workers)?
At least this is the case in the UK.
What he is doing IMO is another example of warped political/social thinking that incorrectly applies one and only one simplistically thought out reason as to why a situation exists. "Oh, there are hardly any black players at Final Tables, must be racism, it's disgusting".
Incidentally, Phil Ivey is of
mixed race, as indeed are many/most African American athletes that excel in certain sports that white people don't excel in. This also applies to Jamaican sprinters, almost all of mixed race. So the whole subject is vast and complex. If PH looks into it he'll also find that many or most of his free coaching applicants are of mixed race.
Would he give free coaching to Tiger Woods given that he is of African American
and (South East) Asian ethnicity?
Last edited by SageDonkey; 07-20-2018 at 03:13 AM.