Quote:
Originally Posted by CoreySteel
And I have also just read this...
Bombay HC rules poker to be a game of chance
In a surprising ruling, a division bench of the Bombay High Court ruled that playing the game of poker amounts to gambling and is a game of pure chance, as per a report in DNA.
https://glaws.in/2018/03/30/bombay-h...r-game-chance/
"poker amounts to gambling and is a game of pure chance"
-not pure chance. Even the late chess candidates tourney that had all players about 2800 rated top players was more a game of pure chance.
"poker cannot be a game of skill as a player simply gets the cards according to chance and the player who gets better cards wins."
-this was proposed by one politician in Finland also. And his argument for players being able to calculate "probabilities" doesn't change that fact. Obviously, it wasn't a fair trial as it has been proven that poker is also a game of skill and for how much depends on known factors. If one plays this or that many hands or is a professional, it is a game of skill, and if something less, it is a game of chance, to put it simply and there are laws in the world for that, as far as they can prove someone is winning with skill.
Often times trading is not considered as gambling but is taxed where gambling necessarily isn't. Poker is closer to trading than gambling. If poker is a game of chance, maybe (not really) the antigambling arena of Mumbai will have it tax free when it gets more legal. For that reason it isn't always better that poker is legally a game of skill, although at many places in India it has been important that it is considered a game of skill instead, as gambling is illegal. But still, if things are changing. It has been taxed even when it has been considered as gambling, so that isn't too likely changing here.
"Secondly, he pleaded that no license or permission is required for playing poker in a private premises amongst friends and that there was no law or rule violated in playing the game of poker. The third argument raised is that poker is a game of skill, exempt from the ambit of gambling under the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act."
"His lawyer Ram Mani Upadhyay also submitted that the game of poker has been recognised by the High Courts of Karnataka and Calcutta. The public prosecutor on the other hand relied on the order of the single judge of the Gujarat High Court that ruled poker to be a game of chance that fell within the ambit of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act."
-Funny how someone picks it based on a previous "Mumbai"/Gujarat case rather than all cases and the facts, but obviously it wasn't a far fight for one reason or the other.
-Mumbai has its own laws, so it could be fine outside of Mumbai/Maharashtra then.
"The decision of the court is however certainly going to be a huge setback for poker in India as it comes months after the Gujarat High Court’s judgement (which is now in appeal before a division bench of the same court)."
-monkeyism.