Quote:
Originally Posted by GMLAW
When you state that he is again being sued, do you mean Foxwoods as the other time he got sued? Because I believe that was vice versa... He sued them because they would not pay his winnings after he spotted a flaw in the deck etc.
No.....by "again"....I meant involved in a "gaming the deck" incident. Last time with Crokfords in London, where they refused to pay him $12 million for similar accusations. He, in fact, sued them....for not paying.
This seems to be common behavior on his part.