Quote:
Originally Posted by KILLingIT
it seems that you read other post than mine. Where do I whine? LOL. I'm trying to give advice to people that are struggling and you say that I whine? Where?
u whine about a lot of stuff ... eg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KILLingIT
The real problem of industry is:
- Segregation
- Bad policies/incompetence of poker sites
you moan that operators aren't nice to you and don't make it comfortable enough ... do you see, why this is funny?
Quote:
Originally Posted by KILLingIT
I was just trying to help guys like you, that the reason you don't win is not huds. They've been around for more than 10 years...
can't you read or are you just ignorant?
Quote:
Originally Posted by NerdSuperfly
HUDs improve someone's winrate and the ability to multi table, which improves the hourly rate. the other really important thing, which you either happily ignore or just don't get, is that comparing the industry nowadays and ten years ago (pre BF) is plain stupid. so yeah, HUDs are around for a long time, i know that, but did you notice, the industry has changed a bit?
...
taking away HUDs and the ability to grind more than 4 or 6 tables, won't make bad players winners, but it will force out some 'winners', which means the cash outs will be reduced.
seriously, did you even read, what i posted or did you go on 'tilt' because i wrote something, you didn't like?
i don't judge ppl using HUD, to the contrary. i said previously poker is a game, where the aim is to make as much money as possible. BUT b/c of that fact, it's inevitable, that we will reach some point of 'saturation'. Add factors like the BF and there's a massive problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KILLingIT
yeah, you say to your boss. MAN, REDUCE MY SALARY PLEASE. I FEEL BAD TO EARN SO MUCH. REDUCE MY SALARY BOSS. What do you think? That we as players should say to poker sites to take more from us? even more? like, rake paid is not enough already?
another example, why you don't have any clue, about being a professional poker player. an operator/poker room isn't your 'boss', so your comparison is beyond stupid. poker players are freelancers and tehy have to look, where they can make a living. they have no contracts, nor guarantees.
poker rooms can do whatever pleases them, if you don't like it, go away, if you can't find something better, you have to adapt or get a new job. but it seems it's way easier to cry about 'how good it was back then'.
i don't have any clue about ur winrates or what limits you play. i just don't care. if you can make a living, then have fun. what bugs me is, that most of the mass tabling grinders out there, depend on rakeback, a high volume and HUDs to make enough money, but still are so overly confident and somehow cocky about their set of skills. a lot of those players have also some weird entitlement about specific conditions and show no lack of professionalism, if these conditions change.
i just simply pint out, that the industry has changed the last 5-6 years and that this kind of arrogance is misplaced
Quote:
Originally Posted by KILLingIT
Banning huds can't be enforced.
banning all HUDs might be not enforceable, but you could make sure, that commercial HUDs won't work. add a limitation of tables, as well as random seat assignment and daily SN changes and HUDs are less helpful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4-Star General
Unenforceable, and you know it.
1. Screenscrape PC a
2. Send the info and run the queries on PC b
3. Display the info on PC a
while this is obvious, almost all forms of cheating prevention isn't unenforceable because smart ppl with enough time/money will find a way. still galfond won't allow everything, b/c "hey, we can't stop cheaters anyway"
but HUD or no HUD, it's way too early to speculate about this stuff, nobody knows the important details ... like which markets RIO poker will enter