Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Phil Galfond to Start a Poker Site (Launched) Phil Galfond to Start a Poker Site (Launched)

09-06-2016 , 10:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheatrich
Sadly, the most likely outcome is phil loses whatever he puts into it $ wise. Details are important (as we don't know what this site's goal is--ie catering to regs or not and who's eligible to play on it) but starting from the ground up at this point is definitely gonna be tough in an industry that's getting worse by the day.
I'd like to know how he's getting the software/graphics up and running, to a point where someone can actually play a game of online poker. Is he coding the software with himself and his RIO buddies? Is he hiring a team of professionals? Is he buying the software?

There's no point discussing small details until the basics are in place.
09-06-2016 , 11:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimStone
They barely manage to hold the status quo currently...




09-07-2016 , 01:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTLou
Not at all.

Actually intrigued by what Professor Gandolf is up to.

Just odd for him to come ITT and effectively say something like "hey I'm gonna open the this new whiz bang brick and mortar casino that is gonna be awesome for players .

But then not say anything about where this casino will be, how big it will be or where the money is coming from to build it. Kinda some basic stuff that enquiring minds want to know.
disrespectful lou at it again. Dude, you are not a player anyway, stick to your pokerpro tables and gtfo!
09-07-2016 , 04:07 AM
4 tables Maximum is a must: it's the easiest way to balance the ratio between regs and fishs in a fair and simple way.
09-07-2016 , 04:17 AM
Rake free HU to get games started will just get abused by HU bum hunters. HU shouldn't be offered, it's the most predatory and recs lose their money fastest at it.

Change the idea to give table starters higher VPPs (whatever is similar) and it might be better.
09-07-2016 , 04:33 AM
Anyone set a line on if this site will see the light of day? PG must be a huge dog.
09-07-2016 , 04:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ankimo
Rake free HU to get games started will just get abused by HU bum hunters. HU shouldn't be offered, it's the most predatory and recs lose their money fastest at it.

Change the idea to give table starters higher VPPs (whatever is similar) and it might be better.
yeah and 6max shouldn't be offered because recs lose their money faster compared to full ring.
09-07-2016 , 04:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by coach999
disrespectful lou at it again. Dude, you are not a player anyway, stick to your pokerpro tables and gtfo!
me thinks you are a freak and a very weird dude

1) you are living in the past , I sold PokerTek to MGAM 2+ years ago. Have had nothing to do it with since. Was time to let my baby go. so I guess I did sorta gtf out of there.

2) If my joke came across as disrespectful to Phil then I apologize to him (not to you... you seem like an angry young boy). Phil is in top 3 of pro players I respect the most. Combo of skill and way he carries himself in the industry.

3) if by player you mean full time then ya thats not me. other than that I've seen a few flops live and online in my time.


But more importantly, thread still spews with comments, suggestion, wishes and dreams which are all pointless unless the MOST BASIC details of the site are released. For starters...

AT LAUNCH, FROM WHICH COUNTRIES WILL THIS SITE ACCEPT BETS ?
09-07-2016 , 05:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheatrich
Sadly, the most likely outcome is phil loses whatever he puts into it $ wise. Details are important (as we don't know what this site's goal is--ie catering to regs or not and who's eligible to play on it) but starting from the ground up at this point is definitely gonna be tough in an industry that's getting worse by the day.
If the site caters for regs I would say it's doomed to fail. Hopefully he doesnt read a single post on here and does his own thing. Hopefully he has some business minded people around him who will steer him in the right direction. What ever happens, this is going to be a tough battle and is most certainly -EV for almost everyone attempting the same.

I like Phil, I really hope he proves me wrong.
09-07-2016 , 01:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iveyhcmc
4 tables Maximum is a must: it's the easiest way to balance the ratio between regs and fishs in a fair and simple way.
Would be even easier if you only serve countries w gdp>30k usd
09-07-2016 , 01:56 PM
new RIO site will be like a porn poker site, you play vs the nude girls and nude man
09-07-2016 , 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by underdog27
new RIO site will be like a porn poker site, you play vs the nude girls and nude man
Excellent contribution to is thread, pretty much exactly what could be expected in NVG.👏
09-07-2016 , 02:34 PM
one might even say it surpassed it
09-07-2016 , 02:53 PM
I just hope for Galfonds sake that he's being smart about this & not putting all his eggs into one basket. Hope he thinks of this investment as if he was playing the one drop & have only like 20% of himself or whatever. The chances of this failing is too great, it's one thing to use your name/poker-fame to market a online training site where "professionals" will naturally be drawn to your product vs an engine that needs to be focused on recreational players to make $.

I think it's a great move by Phil, as long as he isn't going to go broke in the process, pretty sure it will be fun & an exciting challenge for him, best of luck.
09-07-2016 , 03:03 PM
Why not crowdfund this? Is he just the face, and if so, who is really behind it?
09-07-2016 , 03:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wopbabalubop
Why not crowdfund this? Is he just the face, and if so, who is really behind it?
I think Phil wants to control his own site.

There's no point in opening another site with greedy short sighted shareholders.

We already have that in Amaya.

I just want beatable sit and go rake and table caps
09-07-2016 , 04:08 PM
And I want tournaments the way they used to be, dagnabit! In my day you had to show up on time or register by the end of the first level, and there was none of this reentry cash game hybridization nonsense. Your tourney life was your tourney life and that's the way we liked it! In order to live you have to be willing to die, but you Millenials wouldn't know a thing about that, now would you?
09-07-2016 , 04:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximus122
I think Phil wants to control his own site.

There's no point in opening another site with greedy short sighted shareholders.
ya I hear ya.

that dumb 200 year experiment we did here with Capitalism has been such a bust.

Time to move on to some other system.

I vote for Marxism. dunno real know what that is but I just like how it sounds.
09-07-2016 , 06:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTLou
ya I hear ya.

that dumb 200 year experiment we did here with Capitalism has been such a bust.

Time to move on to some other system.

I vote for Marxism. dunno real know what that is but I just like how it sounds.
The only problem with Marxism is human greed.

Society would be much better off if people were paid equally.

But, certain ****ers always want it all for themselves
09-07-2016 , 06:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximus122
The only problem with Marxism is human greed.

Society would be much better off if people were paid equally.

But, certain ****ers always want it all for themselves
There is still time to visit the socialist paradise of Venezuela (but bring your own toilet paper ... they ran out).
09-07-2016 , 07:40 PM
We obviously need more details, but he most likely will need to be able to operate for many years without being profitable. He'll 100% need serious capital investment to make this work.
09-07-2016 , 07:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by underdog27
new RIO site will be like a porn poker site, you play vs the nude girls and nude man
as a recreational player, who plays recreationally, and occasionally pays for pornography as a way of "escaping" from my 9-5 job, i think turning RIO into a porn site is the best idea in this thread.
09-08-2016 , 02:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinivici9586
as a recreational player, who plays recreationally, and occasionally pays for pornography as a way of "escaping" from my 9-5 job, i think turning RIO into a porn site is the best idea in this thread.
That's probably the most balla thing I've ever read on 2p2.
09-08-2016 , 02:26 AM
In poker's Battle of the Phils, a new leader has emerged.
09-08-2016 , 02:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximus122
Quote:
Originally Posted by wopbabalubop
Why not crowdfund this? Is he just the face, and if so, who is really behind it?
I think Phil wants to control his own site.

There's no point in opening another site with greedy short sighted shareholders.

We already have that in Amaya.

I just want beatable sit and go rake and table caps

idk what's sadder ... not to understand, what crowd funding is, or thinking that the (poker) community would come up with enough money

      
m