Quote:
Originally Posted by savant111
Sorry...I made that post at 3am. In my second statement I meant to write that individuals across the autism spectrum SMILE regularly, though not always at the appropriate time. It was in response to the last paragragh in your first post where you wrote:
"Suggesting Peter Eastgate as mildly autistic is interesting. It can explain his rather stoic response when he won the ME as well as his usual demeanor at the table. However, if I'm not mistaken, I did see him crack a smile or two during the NBC heads up. If he is autistic, I would like to know what his personal challenges have been throughout his life, and how he has learned how to cope with them."
In the interest of full disclosure I'd like to point out that I'm a behavior analyst. But also I'm much more interested in autism intervention, and if there was a better method I would learn that instead.
The fact is that ABA techniques are FAR more effective in producing change than all other therapies combined. This is true for individuals with autism who have BOTH high and low skill repertoires. These are not just wild claims. There is a great deal of evidence supporting these statements in the scientific literature.
I'm not saying things like speech, ot, and pt, can't be helpful, just that in general they are usually of much more mild benefit (with exceptions of course).
I thank you for the clarfication. You are right. There are individuals across the spectrum that do smile regularly. However, there are some inviduals on the spectrum that have a very low affect, and show little to no emotion through facial and bodily gestures.
"The fact is that ABA techniques are FAR more effective in producing change than all other therapies combined."
I now understand your support for ABA and respect your profession. However, I have a problem with the word
change here. It's too vague. I completely understand that treatment planning is specific and based on the needs of the individual. But, what "change" are we looking for? I do not doubt the research supporting the efficacy of ABA in treating individuals with autism. However, although I am not a behavioral therapist, I feel ABA is a bit too narrow and rigid.
IMHO "Sensory Integration" is often misunderstood and undervalued when treating individuals with autism. As there are always exceptions, not all individuals with autism will benefit from SI treatment, as they may not have a sensory processing disorder. I will highlight some points of the SI theory.
Sensory Integration Perspective/Theory:
In my own words, occupational thearpists and other professionals, use a SI approach for children who appear to have an sensory processing disorder (SPD). Basically, sensory processing disorders manifests itself either as a modulation, or praxis/motor planning, problem.
1) Modulation: children who are either over responsive or under responsive to sensory input (e.g. a kid might become very agitated to light stroking provided by their care taker/or a child who constantly leans on others, has no sense of personal space-basically poor body awareness-where you might be able to predict that this child will have difficulty maintaining and sustaining social relationships).
2) Praxis: these children really have a hard time with either ideation (have a hard time coming with ideas), or sequencing steps (following essential sequential steps in order to achieve a goal). Many of these children may just stand there, and need to be told what to do step by step. Or, the child may have an abundance of ideas, but might not have the organizational skills to achieve/execute their goal.
Beyond the basic senses (i.e. vision, hearing, taste, olfactory), SI theory highlights the sensory processing of proprioceptive system (information given from our muscles and joints), the vestibular system (gives us our sense of our body in relation to time/space), and the tactile system (touch).
A therapist with SI training can help identify and develop a treatment plan to help remediate the underlying issues of functional outcomes such as 1) attending, and completing and activity (self regulation, organization of behavior) 2) fine motor skills: writing, scissoring, tool use, 3) self care skills: grooming, dressing, feeding, 4) social emotional development: communication, development a sense of self, relationship building skills. A therapist with SI training will carefully activiate or inhibit sensory systems during treatment, to promote learning.
-----------
Everybody has sensory needs and issues. Here are some common SI issues that you might able to relate to:
1) What, How, and When do you provide yourself with sensory input, to help you focus more? For example, when you get tired at work, you might: 1) chew gum (oral input), 2) take a walk around (activation of vestibular, and prop system), 3) play with a sticky texture like tape, or fiddle with your keys (tactile input), 4) play some music (auditory)
You already have a developed sensory system, and have learned strategies to help yourself get in the optimal state of focus to learn and to carry out various work responsibilities. A child who has sensory processsing difficulties may benefit from a "sensory diet": a list of identified activities that help him/her focus, and attend during learning opportunities, and throughout various daily occupations.
2) What sensory input throws and disrupts you? Do you get annoyed by: 1) loud noises, a crying baby, a buzz that doesn't seem to go away, 2) visual distractions such as flashing lights, moving objects, 3) touch such as wool, vinyl, grainy, semi-wet textures 4) going on roller coasters, skydiving, pushing 100 mphs on the high way?
Some of these examples listed may be extreme. But, a child who has a modulation difficulty may react negatively to the same, seemingly harmless, input from someone who has a normal, intact sensory system.
-----------
There are many clinical applications of SI. It is too complex and detailed for me to get into here. If you are interested in SI, I highly recommend the writings of Dr. A. Jean Ayres, PhD, OTR, FAOTA. She has a background in occupational therapy, and psychology. Unfortunately she passed on many years ago due to cancer. However, there are many dedicated researchers, who continue to work in refining her theory and the clinical applications of Sensory Integration.