Oh lol, i didn't know that he offered some kind of prize for this stuff.
Ok, need some explanation i guess. First, why Rob and some of you guys keep talking about 'screen grabbers', OCR gives too many errors, its hard to read nicknames, actions, it depends on skin(s) and resolution. Overall its stupid, i've never used OCR in my code and tools.
as you can see, my tool read FLOP before the client drew it, before dealer message. Read from process memory obv, reverse engineering has been used.
Second, we joke about party security team but lets be honest they aren't that stupid. They can see whats going on and its Game Over, client hacked, realtime hand history with 100% precision (no OCR). HUD is the last problem, realtime hh is the core element of bots and solvers, huds just a bonus. From that point i can see any protection attempts by checking code difference with debugger.
Computer science teach us that we can't rly protect software against reversers (good reading for Rob Yang: Bruce Schneier. Secrets and Lies: Digital Security in a Networked World).
Edit: OPAC bit starts at 32m22s.
Fwiw, I was told by the poker boss of a site many years ago that they had a "sharing names of the bad guys" arrangement with some other sites and they had to pull out of it because some of the sites shared the names of some of the good whales, falsely, so they could keep them to themselves. Maybe he was wrong in his suspicions, of course, because what reputable organisations would do that?
As for Yong wanting to keep a good poker ecology, (the scientific study of the processes influencing the distribution and abundance of organisms, the interactions among organisms, and the interactions between organisms and the transformation and flux of energy and matter), who can blame him for that?
I'd say that probably was me, except we never joined one, in part for that reason, suspicion.. OTOH, we did have a degree of informal cooperation among folks, based on mutual trust ..., verifiable by processor records and hand histories ...
That last point underscores the importance of hand histories in any sincere effort to catch bad guys. Wher I strognly differ with the abolition of access to HH is the foolishness of cutting out player input in a "see something, say something" generation of leads to bad behavior.
as you can see, my tool read FLOP before the client drew it, before dealer message. Read from process memory obv, reverse engineering has been used.
Computer science teach us that we can't rly protect software against reversers (good reading for Rob Yang: Bruce Schneier. Secrets and Lies: Digital Security in a Networked World).
Damn, that is a thing of beauty from a programmer's pov
Sarcasm ? Cause it is really easy, if it is a genuine screen shot.
Thats true, and that was one of the main reasons why I only sent screenshots of people using an hud on party after then ban to people in the thread in PM instead of posting them here.
Now, as a guy who ran a poker room, please tell me: are you not cheating your costumers when you tell them they are completely safe and no one else can use HUD´s vs them and then you cant enforce that policy?
If you listen to his interview he says that a reg who uses a HUD vs a "recreational reg" will just destroy him( this is no sense but wtv). If so, how would you feel about people being scammed at your tables cause you thought you could enforce a policy that is impossible to enforce?
Thats true, and that was one of the main reasons why I only sent screenshots of people using an hud on party after then ban to people in the thread in PM instead of posting them here.
Now, as a guy who ran a poker room, please tell me: are you not cheating your costumers when you tell them they are completely safe and no one else can use HUD´s vs them and then you cant enforce that policy?
If you listen to his interview he says that a reg who uses a HUD vs a "recreational reg" will just destroy him( this is no sense but wtv). If so, how would you feel about people being scammed at your tables cause you thought you could enforce a policy that is impossible to enforce?
Sorry, but I have not and would not listen to his interview unless someone paid me a good hourly rate for my time doing so.
Confiscating the player's money is completely outrageous. Based on the evidence provided in this thread, it appears that the process that PartyPoker has used to do this is obviously both illegal and morally unacceptable.
You can't just take money from someone without giving them a chance to defend themselves.
This organisation is out of control, I don't think they're a safe place to retain a bankroll if they're behaving like this.
Confiscating the player's money is completely outrageous. Based on the evidence provided in this thread, it appears that the process that PartyPoker has used to do this is obviously both illegal and morally unacceptable.
You can't just take money from someone without giving them a chance to defend themselves.
This organisation is out of control, I don't think they're a safe place to retain a bankroll if they're behaving like this.
Indeed, and also every online poker site should at a minimum provide HH's, it's like going to a store and not getting a receipt or even worse buying food that has no ingredients label on it.
So first I should make a new party account (with a computer I dont use for my main play, or virtual machine where I am sure there wont be backdoors to identify my "real" computer to see who tried it), taking a risk of a trojan getting into computer+ paying price, then posting with a new 2+2acc to be sure noone will find traces based on that. If you post a hud they say already knew about it (prove it otherwise...).
On the top of tihs: They can say: you breached tos, they caught you and you tried this "excuse".
Very terrible risk vs reward to show a "working" hud.
The other option is even more silly: develop a hand parser just to prove a point to party which they already know, sacraficing at least 50 hours? (for not a good programmer)
This is not more than party blowing the dog whistle for recs with "restricting" pros, trying to make them believe its safe now to deposit, all the shark's teeth are pulled out. No one cares couple people who are not totally clueless about technologies in poker and can see through. Those people wont be net depositors for the most part.
A multimillion dollar business for sure have budget for proper forum PR.
The rest whats going on here you figure out yourself.
Oh lol, i didn't know that he offered some kind of prize for this stuff.
Ok, need some explanation i guess. First, why Rob and some of you guys keep talking about 'screen grabbers', OCR gives too many errors, its hard to read nicknames, actions, it depends on skin(s) and resolution. Overall its stupid, i've never used OCR in my code and tools.
as you can see, my tool read FLOP before the client drew it, before dealer message. Read from process memory obv, reverse engineering has been used.
Second, we joke about party security team but lets be honest they aren't that stupid. They can see whats going on and its Game Over, client hacked, realtime hand history with 100% precision (no OCR). HUD is the last problem, realtime hh is the core element of bots and solvers, huds just a bonus. From that point i can see any protection attempts by checking code difference with debugger.
Rob's logic is totally faulty. As you said ocr's accuracy it depends on lots of things, also can be operated with a high grade camera which record the screen, and solver / hud data operates on a totally different pc. But seeing how party wasnt capable of noticing Visual studio I dont think one should make software that complicated.
We talk about huds, not a fully automatized bot so even if they do something against reading of HH's from client, OCR still a viable option and not too much to care about 'noises'. If ocr gives a bot 0.5% where it totally make random decision ( shoving for stacks with ****ty hand or similarly costly mistakes) it can burn away profit, but if your hud has 0.5% error in your data you might as well call that 'noise', which makes the stats slightly tweaked but wont make hud useless.
Fwiw, I was told by the poker boss of a site many years ago that they had a "sharing names of the bad guys" arrangement with some other sites and they had to pull out of it because some of the sites shared the names of some of the good whales, falsely, so they could keep them to themselves. Maybe he was wrong in his suspicions, of course, because what reputable organisations would do that?
As for Yong wanting to keep a good poker ecology, (the scientific study of the processes influencing the distribution and abundance of organisms, the interactions among organisms, and the interactions between organisms and the transformation and flux of energy and matter), who can blame him for that?
How does sharing private info with 3rd party fit with the privacy laws?
Not that I ever cheated but sharing data with whoever they want doesnt seem too legal for me.
How does sharing private info with 3rd party fit with the privacy laws?
Not that I ever cheated but sharing data with whoever they want doesnt seem too legal for me.
Of course it doesn't comply with the law.
But they've just taken someone's money a few posts earlier with not even the pretense of natural justice, so this is hardly surprising.
In this respect, they're just behaving like a lawless cowboy operation.
A user of the Partypoker UK FB group has had his Partypoker account banned for 3rd party tool use following an explicit request to demonstrate the abilty to use Equilab.