Quote:
Originally Posted by xPeru
Honest answer is I don't know, but I'd be surprised if Mexico breached the 3% limit. However, UK licensed operators must legally justify their operations in ALL countries where they don't have a national license--the 3% limit is a threshold for the amount of justification the UKGC wants to see.
Since the old laws were written so long before internet gambling, I think Stars are perfectly justified in arguing that it is not against Mexican law for an operator based in the IoM to offer internet poker to Mexican residents. I would be confident that they will continue there up to the implementation date and beyond (if they get a license).
@Muddy 7 - you seem to have skipped the first few pages of the the thread - the bill doesn't say anything about segregating the Mexican market from the rest of the World - but it does use some rather ill-defined language including "se atiendan" which make it appear that game play must be run on servers based in Mexico through the .mx.com site.
When I first suggested that the market looked like it might be segregated in an article for pokerfuse PRO, I hedged my language deliberately, because the wording--and I speak Spanish and live in Peru--was unclear.
I expected to hear quickly from PokerStars or one of the other major operators if my interpretation was wrong--whenever I get something wrong, I normally get a blistering email from someone--but my inbox is empty.
And I'm not giving away commercial secrets if I say that we have corporate or individual subscriptions from all the major poker operators--so they've all read my take on the issue.
xPeru,
Thanks for the information. Feel fee to pm me if you want to discuss this further, without giving away commercial secrets.
FWIW, the argument regarding the legality of online poker services being offered to the market in Mexico under current laws, which I think Stars actually presented at one point, goes as follows:
The current laws have been described to me as defining poker as having an essential physical element of "cards". Online presentations of any game that does not use "cards" is not to be considered as "poker" or an illegal
card game.
OTOH, Stars got slammed at a live tournament event, reportedly not because of the tournament play, but because they also offered standard live play cash games.
(I am not a lawyer in Mexico, and my Spanish is limited to poker, restaurants, and local services. So, I appreciate any insights folks can offer.)