Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
OK, Here's The Truth OK, Here's The Truth

06-12-2007 , 01:00 PM
The main thing to understand is that I wrote my OP to let people know that I wasn't aware of the Newhizzle story. Without that story, what I was doing is just par for my course whether you agree with it or not. I rarely care what people think about me as long as it is based on accurate information.

But like I said, I would have done things differently if I had known about that story.

As far as "distancing" myself from her, that wasn't what my post is about. She wasn't too thrilled I said she was a little nutty but then she went on to say "I guess that's because the truth hurts huh"? I'll still teach her if she wants and if I do, it is with Mark's blessing. Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I'm done.
06-12-2007 , 01:05 PM
Quote:
Let me know who wants to lay her after I'm done.
FYP.
06-12-2007 , 01:09 PM
The real reason for this post is because David has repeatedly shown himself to be a sucker when it comes to cute young girls, and he really, really, really doesn't want other people to think he could be so irrational/stupid.
06-12-2007 , 01:10 PM
since when did everyone decide that polygraphs produced correct results? With people who are insane, they can certainly "believe" in this alternate reality that they have convinced themselves actually happened. For brandi, she could easily be insane to the point where she is convinced she didnt lose the money she actually lost. This being the case, she would pass the polygraph, everyone on here would believe shes right and she would still be wrong. I dont think the polygraph would do anything.
06-12-2007 , 01:14 PM
Quote:
Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I'm done.
Right here.
06-12-2007 , 01:15 PM
david needs a PR person. he's almost as bad as olivert.
06-12-2007 , 01:25 PM
Quote:
Still she looks good for being 25.


and with those six words and a number ds totally redeems himself. david.

however, it is kind of hard to believe that you could have even scanned the original thread and gotten to the POB jokes w/out at least picking up some context stuff about newhizzle.
06-12-2007 , 01:25 PM
David.....whats your phone #? My boss wants to chew you out for making me unproductive today.
06-12-2007 , 01:25 PM

David, if I may be so bold as to offer you a sound piece of advice at this point:

06-12-2007 , 01:27 PM
Quote:
since when did everyone decide that polygraphs produced correct results? With people who are insane, they can certainly "believe" in this alternate reality that they have convinced themselves actually happened. For brandi, she could easily be insane to the point where she is convinced she didnt lose the money she actually lost. This being the case, she would pass the polygraph, everyone on here would believe shes right and she would still be wrong. I dont think the polygraph would do anything.
It would do plenty. Whether the deluded one was Brandi or Mark. I already said that they both might pass. But in my book, and in the book of most professional gamblers, such a result (assuming the polygraph wasn't scammed) has a big implication compared to one of them failing.
06-12-2007 , 01:31 PM
"Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I'm done"....

That is not a very inviting proposition, the meaning of which could be misconstrued.
06-12-2007 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Any other questions?
So, are you saying that you would only have sex with honest girls? If so, you really are....sad.

pokervintage
06-12-2007 , 02:50 PM
Quote:
Quote:
since when did everyone decide that polygraphs produced correct results? With people who are insane, they can certainly "believe" in this alternate reality that they have convinced themselves actually happened. For brandi, she could easily be insane to the point where she is convinced she didnt lose the money she actually lost. This being the case, she would pass the polygraph, everyone on here would believe shes right and she would still be wrong. I dont think the polygraph would do anything.
It would do plenty. Whether the deluded one was Brandi or Mark. I already said that they both might pass. But in my book, and in the book of most professional gamblers, such a result (assuming the polygraph wasn't scammed) has a big implication compared to one of them failing.
yes, but my point is that you dont want something with "big implications" to be based off of a test that doesnt test whether one is "telling the truth" so much as "not straying away from what they believe to be the truth". These are VERY different things in the mind of brandi. At least from the things I have read.
06-12-2007 , 02:57 PM
David,

"Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I'm done."

What is the wager?
06-12-2007 , 02:59 PM
DS.. FFS WE ALL WANT TO KNOW

1. did brandi turn 1k into 200k? do you even know if its true? Did you tell her what a CD is.. cuz uh.. she didn't figure that out on her own for damn sure


2. Capt Tom Franklin.... WHAT HAPPENED .. IF YOU DONT WANT TO ELABORATE SAY SO PLZ
06-12-2007 , 03:02 PM
Quote:
David,

"Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I'm done."

What is the wager?
NLH. 5K freezeout. 100-200 blinds.
06-12-2007 , 03:04 PM
Quote:
The main thing to understand is that I wrote my OP to let people know that I wasn't aware of the Newhizzle story. Without that story, what I was doing is just par for my course whether you agree with it or not.
Last three topics of yours I've read (this and in Maths, Science & Philosophy) have had the same form, basically stating "look, under this weirdly constrained view of reality my behaviour is not despicable."

From most views of reality, your behaviour is despicable. I hope this forum is on Brandi's side when she turns on you.
06-12-2007 , 03:16 PM
I think I respected DS more when I thought he was trying to Jedi Mind Trick her into bed. Because some of you guys are nuts, she's smokin' hot. Wacko? Sure. But anyone who writes prose like this is #1 in my book:

The next night, he crawled into bed with me naked. His penis on my back, frighten me, and woke me in the middle of the night. I freaked out and spent the rest of the night in the bathroom. I crawled to sleep on the floor and used the towels as blankets. I was traumatized.
06-12-2007 , 03:23 PM
wtf? gimme my time back.
06-12-2007 , 03:25 PM
06-12-2007 , 04:12 PM
Quote:
NLH. 5K freezeout. 100-200 blinds.
06-12-2007 , 04:14 PM
I'm impressed.
06-12-2007 , 04:16 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Let me know who wants to lay her after I'm done.
FYP.
Sklansky's sloppy seconds? No thanks.
06-12-2007 , 04:17 PM
Quote:
Quote:
NLH. 5K freezeout. 100-200 blinds.

Are you suggesting that DS has put forth an open offer of 6:5 on a coinflip? NOWAI.
06-12-2007 , 04:17 PM
Quote:
Quote:
David,

"Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I'm done."

What is the wager?
NLH. 5K freezeout. 100-200 blinds.
lolololol

      
m