The more I think about it the worse the Lamb re-seat is. He's plays at a table. Gets moved to another. Plays, what 10 hands? Gets moved back to the same seat. Meanwhile, the rest of the table has seen more of each other than him, and was most likely discussing his play somewhat while he was gone.
It can still be random moves, just with a "not back in the same seat" caveat. Just, why introduce the head-scratcher.
If Lamb loses because of this, I'm def boycotting next year's $1M buy-in.
Last edited by Holliday; 07-18-2011 at 09:31 PM.
Reason: oops, added zero to buy in